![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5167462479&fromMakeTrack=true |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
The good news is the seller is honest enough to say it is a reprint. The bad news is where did he get the holder and label? Neither are PSA authentic. Am I naive or am I missing something? Can anyone holder a reprint and get a PSA label? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jackgoodman
a slabbed Wagner at the Hollywood Park show in a dealer case- but the label stated "reprint". I think it was a PSA holder (not absolute) and thought that it was "great" that they were now slabbing reprints. Did anyone else see it? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
That's fine- but this holder doesn't say reprint. Enormous difference. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dave
i looked on psa's website and the serial number on the psa label is in the data base |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
He is saying that the label is bogus. The slab was cracked out and the fake card was put in there. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
But someone along the food chain is destined to be bamboozled and buy this card as real for a bargain price. How can PSA put this kind of label on a card? I'm still missing something. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve k
Very scary isn't it? The seller is honest but I'm not so sure about the people bidding on it. Whoever did this made it look very real but didn't seem to do a good copying job of the PSA "hologram" on the back of the label. Of course they're going to quickly learn to just copy the front of the label, bust open a cheap PSA $5 card and seperate and paste the back hologram to the copied front label. Again - very scary...PSA is going to have to take steps with the front of their label similar to the way the government has changed the currency to help thwart counterfeiters. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Guys, |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
COMPARE: |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard Dwyer
My Wagner was slabbed by a crook over 5 years ago! (Alan Hagar) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred
I bet this card gets the heave ho by ebay real soon. If PSA is going to have an error (which they made) of Heine Wagner (labeled Honus) pulled from ebay I'm fairly certain that they will have this fake one pulled. If they have any sense at all they will press charges against the seller and ensure that everyone knows that they have taken these measures. Anything less would be allowing an infringement of a great magnitude to further tarnish their already weakening image. I wish nothing bad for the seller but this shows a lack of common sense. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: HonestWagner
..but that one takes the cake. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Daniels
the above collector/dealers forgot about high school typing or they just do not look at their PSA labeled cards a lot or they would see the font is clearly not the same. Did you post your Wagner on the CU chat board? ; ) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve k
No one here can know for certain that this font was never used. I have seen subtle differences in the fonts between older graded and newer graded PSA cards. But having the right font isn't even the point here. The next scammer/counterfeiter could easily change the font. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Also keep in mind that while experienced collectors like ourselves recognized instantly that the font size is wrong, how will the guy who is relatively new to the hobby who thinks he is getting a bargain on a Wagner be protected? It's the beginner who is going to get scammed, not the veteran, and I think PSA would go ballistic if they saw this. That label is outright fraud. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
...PSA never used that font....ever! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Pete
Hi board members, |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve k
For those "experts" here who "know it all" about the history of PSA fonts, and anyone else - if the label is completely counterfeit and wasn't copied, then how would you duplicate the barcode? Or does the counterfeiter just generate a random barcode figuring nobody is going to check that, that a potential buyer is only going to check the certification number? Also, is there some way on the internet to check out if a barcode is accurate/real or not? One thing is for certain, if PSA doesn't develop a solution for this problem, then buying expensive cards off of ebay could be rendered obsolete, except for dealers with the most impeccable of reputations. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Pete
There is an actual group of barcode fonts that can create a valid barcode that will be read by a barcode scanner. I believe that all barcodes are in the form of somekind of standardization for inventory purposes like at the grocerystore they can make their own for the isles etc. I do know this much, in a small amout of time with a computer and and a decent color printer a psa replica tag could be made that would have all the needed characteristics to pass a visual inspection and a database inquiry could leave one to beleive they were looking at the card that psa registered. Once someone cracked a legit psa case slipped that in and a phoney card, now you have a huge problem. From what I am reading about fonts etc not being the same over the years creates an even bigger mess, or yet has psa been using the same font consistently for years, and these cards with different fonts have been scams all along ? The only people who can really know the answer to font consistancy are working for PSA, The rest of us may have just assumed all along that these minor diff are just PSA variations and not an scam. This I would like to know the answer to. I am currently looking at all my Psa cards, escepially lower gradeded once that no one would have a desire to scam ( i do not own a wagner LOL) and honestly they so far are all the same. If I find an 8 that looks like a 6 and has a diff font, i might start to cry. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Pete
I just looked at 25 psa graded cards I have, They have been collected over the years as I have never sent 1 card to them for grading, so I feel that it is a pretty good cross ref of time and grades. RESULTS: 23 Identical to each other 2 identical to each other all have same font used but the 2 buddies are not as bold as the other 23 that all match each other all are 1950s and 60s graded 3-8. I would love to here some of your results. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
That card labelled altered reprint is funny. If I was a grader and someone asked for his altered, grade poor reprint to be entombed and labelled as an altered, grade poor reprint, I'd have one question: "Why?" |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I think once counterfeiters learn how duplicate a holder, label, and barcode without it being readily detected (and that day may not be far away) the hobby will have to be overhauled completely. That Wagner card is one of the most dangerous things I have seen in this hobby. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Darren J. Duet
I'm sorry for all those who really believe that this card is PSA graded. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard Dwyer
No-one but ASA would slab the card at that time. Only Alan Hagar. Why? Because I was impressed with the amount of time and effort that was used to try to fool someone. Didn't fool me. That's why I had it slabbed "Altered Reprint". |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
Are standard in Microsoft Word's envelope printing function. I'm sure that it wouldn't be hard to find them elsewhere with a quick search on Google. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Morrie
I'm pretty confident that label has been photoshopped. If you take the image and blow it up, the pixelation doesn't look right compared to other blown-up PSA labels. The discoloration around the letters is more consistent with inserted text blocks than with text printed onto a sheet of paper. It looks like the original label information was whited out (the white is way too clean) and the new text inserted. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: petecld
To Steve K: |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
The question is is for what honest purpose would someone be willing to pay over $400 for this item? $5 or $10 on a lark I could see, but hundreds of dollars an item represented as a cheap reprint doesn't sound so wholesome. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Vargha
It is on an ad on the back of the February SMR magazine. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred
I am the under bidder on this sham of an auction. I bid on it because ebay will send me an email telling me why the auction was removed. There is no way that this auction is going the distance. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John B
The auction should have been pulled immediately. The description is way too vague and it tries to wiggle out of any liability. The seller can't even vouch for the authenticity of the holder. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
Ebay doesn't care about anything as long as the $$$$ are coming in. They blatantly allow fraud on their site and protect it! If you write a bidder to tell them that what they are bidding on is a doctored fake, ebay will boot you for auction interference. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Among the bizarre things here is that the seller is disclosing the card is a reproduction yet the bidding is still at $460 with five days to go. That's a lot of money to pay for something worth zero, and that's why I think it is so dangerous. The profile of the person who would spend good money on this is not the veteran collector who has years of hobby experience and spends time on the network54 board sharing information. It's the uninformed person who thinks the card is still worth a great deal, and if there is someone willing to pay $460 (and it will certainly go higher) who's to say there isn't someone willing to pay 5K, 10K, or even more. There is a perception that it has been examined by an authenticator, and while we all know it is bogus, there are people out there who can be preyed upon. It is very deceptive, and I think it is too simplistic to write it off as an easy to spot fake. For this board, yes; for a novice collector, it's trouble with a capital "T". |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dennis W.
First off I agree with Barry when he says how dangerous this item is to the hobby. Next a few observations from both a software engineer/graphics designer (15+ years) perspective and that of a collector. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
When you say it would cost thousands of dollars to get the equipment to properly seal holders, keep in mind that that money could be recouped by selling one card. That too is a scary thought. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
is the seller must have been notified by ebay to end auction,or face the wrath of the slabbing gods. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WANTED - PSA graded WAGNER (E90-1, E91, E92, E95, E102) | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 04-11-2009 05:23 PM |
WOW! PSA! T206 DOYLE! WOW!!!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 84 | 01-10-2009 01:21 PM |
T206 Honus Wagner with Tolstoi back (PSA graded) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-11-2008 12:09 AM |
New 550 card T206 find with Wagner - Graded by BVG | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 01-19-2008 06:22 AM |
PSA graded T206 Honus Wagner on EBay ... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-11-2004 01:54 PM |