![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: matthew
Hello, I just started collecting vintage and pre war cards and was wondering. Will a small marker spot on a baseball card make it ungradeable. I'm new to this and couldn't find anything specific with a search in this forum. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred
I guess it would depend on the mark. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: matthew
Well, the mark is a little dot on the bottom corner. The color of the card is green and the mark is green. I'm not 100% sure it's a green marker spot but I don't think that just one little spot is going to be a darker green than the rest of the card. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tom Boblitt
been altered, PSA will sometimes grade as qualifier 'MK' if it's not done to try to enhance the card but only as something that was added to the card. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: matthew
Thats what I thought, but I'm not getting the difference between "enhanced and added to". I'm guessing it was chipped on the corner and someone marked it with the marker to cover the chip. If it didn't have the mark it looks like it would be a 6 or 7 grade. I wonder how much the price would be affected. The card is actually a 54 Aaron rookie and even though this is a pre war forum the grading would still apply to post war cards. I'm trying to learn quickly and am currently buying 54 and older cards. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ron
Matt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie
a little pen mark in the white border of a T206--someone was discussing the card with a pen in his hand, and got the pen too close to the card while he was discussing the border. This is obviously not "enhancement"! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: matthew
Well, the mark I think was obviously done on purpose. I'm wondering if I should try to return it considering the amount I payed for it. He didn't say anything about the mark and said it needed grading in the post. He also used the words that he pulled this card. I guess that means he pulled it from an originall unopened package maybe. Other than the mark and the rough cut on the edges it's in awsome shape. If it's worth the 700 I payed for it then maybe I would keep it even with the mark. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Howie
Maybe he pulled the card from the stack of cards bodybagged from grading. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: andy becker
hi matthew |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd (nolemmings)
It is a question of intent and appearance. If someone is trying to mask a flaw with ink, it will likely be rejected. If the appearance makes it look like someone has tried to mask it, it will likewise be rejected, even if the mark somehow "innocently" got there. If it does not mask, then it is likely considered a flaw that will lead to a downgrade or qualifier (depending on what grading service you use), but should be graded. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: andy becker
you said it todd, bring on the '50s |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
how on earth can you divine what was being thought by the marker-er when he put the pen to the card? I have always thought it was asinine for the service to grade a card with writing on it in some cases but reject the card as altered in other cases. Ditto for trimming--it never made sense to me that a card with a corner nipped off or a hole in it gradable in poor condition but one with a side shaved is totally ungradable. We need an "authentic" grade for these kinds of cards. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
Wont GAI grade the card as authentic even if the mark is deemed to be an alteration? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred
I thought PSA offered this service. I called them but nobody could explain what their "Authentic" designation indicated. It's been a while since I looked at the PSA web site. Perhaps they've corrected this oversight and now provide an explanation of the "Authentic" designation (for their slabs) on their web site. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Hello, actually I'm deployed to Iraq right now so I don't have a scaner to show you the card but I just thought of posting the ebay post. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jack goodman
Stay safe. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: tbob
Can anyone else verify this? The reason I ask is I have some high end caramel cards which I'd like to get in to slabs for protection and storage purposes which have allegedly either been trimmed or enhanced with color. I could care less about the grades, just want them protected. I wonder if you specifically have to ask GAI for that connotation (????). |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Elkins
it is used for cards like strip cards, which were hand cut. I do know that when I firt joined GAI, I sent them several T206's - a couple came back "trimmed" and ungraded. These were just O/C, as I sent them to another company and they graded (I believe one was a Matty)!!!!!! Anyway, one of my recent "batches" that came back from them had a GD/VG strip card of Ty Cobb - it is slabbed "Authentic" by GAI. I don't think they will slab cards authentic, unless they were meant to have been cut (like a strip card). |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TAKING OFFERS -- 1 T card, 1 E card 1 Notebook card 1 Diamond Star plus extra!! | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 12-11-2008 10:09 AM |
For sale 1932 Zeenut Hollywood Vitt, Manager Card cool card | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-24-2008 11:44 AM |
1886 Hancock's Clothing card....1st minor league card | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 4 | 07-25-2008 11:46 PM |
Re: Can An Off-Register Card or A Card With a Slight Printer's Flaw Be Considered NrMint? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 10-27-2007 09:43 AM |
Ruth-Gehrig card, near mint, in Gary Engel's Japanese card auction. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-28-2002 06:33 PM |