 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-02-2004, 12:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Has "VG" been redefined?
Posted By: Paul
This is the second one of these I've found in the past week or 10 days. A card with multiple obvious rips on the front, graded VG by PSA. We used to call these "poor" or worse. If this is the way PSA is now grading ripped cards, I have quite a few that I'd like to submit. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1929 R316 "Kashin Publications" Babe Ruth with "MADE IN U.S.A" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-06-2022 02:27 PM |
| T206 Old Mill "Single Factory Overprint" & Cobb "Red Hindu" & "Uzit | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2009 06:28 PM |
| John "Rowdy Jack" Joseph "Peach Pie" O'Connor ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-17-2005 11:58 AM |
| Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 01:23 PM |
| Ben guessed the "1452". MW ( vaguely) guessed the "sjowall."" " | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-22-2003 06:57 PM |
Hybrid Mode
