![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Nick
Hello, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
depending on the card, I've had some cards that look much worse in the scan then they do in person. It is a dilema as to what to do. I've just left the scan the way it is and make a note that card looks much better in person, which sounds a bit husterish, which bothers me as much as possibley retouching the scan. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hankron
Pointing out or otherwise detailing all the flaws (within reason, most auction bidders aren't there to read a novel), will often hurt you in the short run but help you in the long run. In the long run, if it is known to bidders that you detail all the faults of an item and provide big pictures, they will not only bid with confidence but will have no doubt when you claim "This is perfect." On the other hand, all those sellers who attach the adjective "rare" to 1988 Fleer Tom Glavine Rookies and such, have dug themselves in a hole when they actually have something that is rare (This also explains how the term 'ultra-rare' came into being). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: petecld
I've had this same problem with scanning cards. For some raeson creases just seem to show up a lot worse than when you see the card in your hand. I wish there was an answer that makes it fair to the buyer and the seller. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: julie
I recently sent a N172 GAI 6.5 Ewing with Mascot to two people--and what a mess it looked (and I had bragged about how undergraded it was, etc.). There was all sorts of white stuff like scrapes on both sides, and the focus was a tad blurry. It's very embarassing (and I wasn't even trying to sell it!)--but i don't even know how to doctor scans--the built in stuff around the picture doesn't work at all. I will shortly be trying to sell a N172 Kelly--and i don't know what to do if it doesn't come out looking like the card! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lee Behrens
Nick, I have the same problem with my scanner. On most creases it seems to enhance the crease and make it look worse that it actually is. I have been wondering what also to do because if you leave a note about it in the description it makes you look like you are cheating the buyer because they can see the picture and know you are telling them it isn't so bad. I guess the only thing you can do is to add a little side note, because you know that you are telling the truth and hopefully that is enough for the people to believe. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
I haven't run into the described problem, but my suggestion would be to try editing the contrast on the resulting file. There are also options on some scanners and editing packages for "enhancing contrast or detail" - make sure these options are not turned on. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Card Information | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 06-06-2008 10:38 AM |
Any information on this bat? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 06-05-2008 08:53 AM |
Any information would be appreciated | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-29-2007 07:11 PM |
Newbie looking for information! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-31-2006 01:25 PM |
any information? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-16-2006 09:14 PM |