 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-09-2002, 02:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
This is a first
Posted By: petecld
This is a first for me. Look at: 
|
|
#3
02-09-2002, 03:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a first
Posted By: Bill Cornell
That e92 Matty does look short top-to-bottom.
|
|
#4
02-09-2002, 04:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a first
Posted By: TBob
is genrally good enough for me to stay away from a card. I had given this one some thought but will probably be glad I let it go. Besides, how many of this pose does one guy need? I have 3 of this pose from 3 different sets, this would have been number 4.
|
|
#5
02-09-2002, 05:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a first
Posted By: Elliot
The bidder's first positive feedback (over 3 years ago) is from this seller. Also. in the past little while he's bid on 4 of the seller's auctions---all in different collecting areas. Out of a positive feedback of 12---seems unlikely. If this isn't a case of shill bidding I'd be very surprised.
|
|
#6
02-09-2002, 08:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a first
Posted By: petecld
I had forgotten I e-mailed the seller to check what color printing is on the back of the card. The name in the e-mail from the seller is LARRY HOLT.
|
|
#8
02-11-2002, 11:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a first
Posted By: Anonymous
Don't waste your time reporting shill bidding to eBay, they wouldn't recognize it if it bit them in the arse. Check out the PSA 9 1955 Jackie Robinson #1800810901 and #1802126193. I reported it and got the usual canned response.
|
|
#9
02-11-2002, 11:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a first
Posted By: jay behrens
wow, that's some delivery service they found. That card wetn from KC to SF in less than 4 hours. That is pretty sad if eBay did nothing about that. A 4 year old could see what is going on there.
|
|
#10
02-11-2002, 01:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a first
Posted By: MW
After all, there IS a same-day delivery service for FedEx. Although considering that the card only reached 54% of the SMR price, I doubt the seller would have been willing to "foot" the extra expense.
|
|
#12
02-11-2002, 01:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a first
Posted By: Elliot
I think the guy just listed it with the scan from the first listing, without having received the card. Look at the neg he got from the first seller---he never paid for the card, he was just trying to make a quick flip.
|
|
#13
02-11-2002, 03:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a first
Posted By: jay behrens
Don't even get me started on UPS. After they 'lost' a game used Willie Mays bat from the 1951 WS that was supposed to be signed by anyone that touched it, I have no desire to ever spend money with them. All they did was write a check for the insured amount and didn't bother to investigate or try and locate the item. Needless to say, there were several unhappy people as a result of this.
|
|
#14
02-11-2002, 05:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a first
Posted By: Julie Vognar
The first leland auction I bid in, I went for an extreme close=up of Joe Jackson's face. If he hadn't been looking over the photographer's shoulder, he would have looked crosseyed. Never saw it before; never seen it since (except in my collection). Leland can be, er, really dumb. Said in the catalogue the "C" on Jackson's cap meant he was with the White Sox, and called it a "Brace photo" because george Brace's stamp, Chicago, 2-number zip, was on the back (George Brace is only now in his eighties). Leland's can be really nice. Before I bid $1650 on it, I said, "I'm going to need 3 extra weeks to pay for this if I bid any higher." ":No problemm," said the man. That was without the 15%.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
