![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Im a vintage guy... starting to get into some modern.... for any of the modern collectors can you give me your opinion on a refractor vs the wave version of that refractor...
i know they come in different colors and some rarer then others.. but what is the difference between a blue refractor numbered to 150 and a blue refractor wave also numbered to 150? does one sell for more then the other? thanks
__________________
Jamie Looking for T206 Errors, Ghosts and Severe Miscuts |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
what type of a reduction do you place on the wave? 20%? 30%?
thanks for the valuable info.
__________________
Jamie Looking for T206 Errors, Ghosts and Severe Miscuts |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's not real exact, but I'd say on average the variants sell for 80% or so of the true colors.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’m assuming the lower the pop the more expensive the refractor? But do you ever see certain colors sell for more just because it’s “gold version”?
Trying to make sense out of a gold variation out of 50 selling for more than an orange version out of 25. Both being a Normal refractor. (Non wave version etc) I would have thought the version out of 25 is far more valuable then the version out of 50.
__________________
Jamie Looking for T206 Errors, Ghosts and Severe Miscuts |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Traditionally the main attractions are the refractor auto to 499, the true blue refractor to 150 and the red to 5. People like orange to 25 and gold to 50 too.
Even though they sometimes have lower or equal serial numbers the purple to 299, wave refractors, green to 99, and yellow to 75 are less desirable. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 11-26-2024 at 05:29 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah the silver prism in basketball is akin to the refractor for Bowman. People love the refractor auto for first Bowman cards. They sometimes sell for much more than lower serial numbered cards of less desirable color variations.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will gladly trade all of these refractors I have for any of those T206s errors, ghosts and miscuts you have !
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
the "true" colors always demand more, and gold is just a popular color because well, people like gold. for chrome, red /5, gold /50, blue /150 are the most desirable because they have longest tenure / lineage in products, everything else seems to have been slotted in later to justify printing more but still giving people hits. orange came soon after so is still quite desirable.
some #'s are exclusive to certain products, like green /99 for awhile was only in retail. on panini side, there are various sku's that contain specific parallels as well. imho, i would stick only to the true red, orange, gold and blue parallels if your budget allows as most of the others have less demand despite lower or equal supply. the waves and lavas etc can sometimes be as low as 50% of the true alternative, but agreed 70-80% is about right as a rule of thumb. they are still great cards of course, but there's something about having the true that over time you realize you're glad you spent the few extra bones to get the one that matters the most.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------- Signed Jackie Robinson Run: 4/8 (50B, 53T, 54T, 55T). Signed 1948 / 1949 Leaf Baseball Set: 56/98. Always looking for more! https://www.flickr.com/photos/198641438@N03/albums/ --not always up to date... |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
here's a good thread with helpful perspectives too:
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1558142
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------- Signed Jackie Robinson Run: 4/8 (50B, 53T, 54T, 55T). Signed 1948 / 1949 Leaf Baseball Set: 56/98. Always looking for more! https://www.flickr.com/photos/198641438@N03/albums/ --not always up to date... |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hypothetical Question, could Ruth hit modern pitching | kmac32 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 152 | 10-18-2023 05:40 AM |
Prewar and Modern Question | BlueCrew | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 04-14-2023 10:10 PM |
Modern autos question | jchcollins | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 19 | 08-02-2019 09:00 AM |
Modern day collectors, question on SPs and SSPs | AGuinness | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 7 | 02-01-2019 12:49 PM |
Question on modern packs with gum | JustinD | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 8 | 06-11-2017 09:30 AM |