![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ever since I picked this item up last week, I've read a lot of old threads on Gone With the Stain and its history. Has anyone used this service since Dick passed away?
I don't expect to make soaking a hobby -- I just want it for this one item -- so I'd rather trust a pro than my non-existent skills. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What stain?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just looking to have the card removed from the scrapbook backing.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, more info is obviously needed. Is the 'card' adhered to the canvas and you want it removed? Is that the issue? Or is it something else?
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sorry --- yes, that's exactly the deal.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Leave it be and buy another.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Perhaps oddly, I find the card more attractive adhered to the burlap. I would leave it as-is.
I don't collect 19th Century cards, though, nor do I know much about that segment of the hobby. So, mine is just an "eye of the beholder" opinion. It's possible this is just an eyesore to most collectors.
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
We should probably ask Tiffany first. Anyone know where the hobby princess is?
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would vote to leave it alone too. It looks pretty good the way it is.
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Appreciate the thought — I’ve definitely swayed that direction since it arrived.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've removed one from scrap book paper before. They are pretty thick/solid cardboard. Not sure what burlap is like....
__________________
Collecting Federal League (1914-1915) H804 Victorian Trade Cards N48 & N508 Virginia Brights/Dixie/Sub Rosa NY Highlanders & Fed League Signatures ....and Japanese Menko Baseball Cards https://japanesemenkoarchive.blogspot.com/ |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The one nice thing with it being on burlap is that it should be much easier to tell right through the slab what type of adhesive was used. If you're seeing any sort of discoloration on the back as the result of the glue, I would guess that to mean a harsher adhesive was used. If it's light in color, or not much evidence of anything, I'd venture it was attached with a paste and thereby a safer candidate for an easy soak.
The piece itself appears free from creases. My main concern with cards from such sets would be creases on things like arms, legs, heads or bats--any thinner, narrow areas which would be extra prone to separation if soaked. I have never soaked this issue, so definitely defer to others with more familiarity. Last edited by BillyCoxDodgers3B; 08-07-2024 at 07:20 PM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you for the insight. The back looks like a completely different surface and I can’t see any residue. The die cut is really small and I assume quite delicate — just not sure it’s worth the risk trying to separate since they’re not highly valuable to begin with.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, that was an unforeseen surprise! Something glued on the other side as well! Guess you'll never truly know unless you crack it.
Like others have said, it looks pretty nice as is. And it's already slabbed, for those who like that sort of thing. I believe someone else thought it might be an idea to simply buy another copy since these apparently aren't terribly costly. Might be the way to go. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah I’ve gotten a lot more comfortable with the look — wish it was more of an even-cut square, but it’s actually a pretty cool backing.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When is a Stain NOT a Frickin' Stain???? | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 17 | 04-20-2023 03:01 PM |
Topps Venezuelan - To Soak or not to Soak? | Bestdj777 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 05-14-2015 09:39 PM |
To Soak or Not To Soak - That is the Question | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 04-11-2015 08:35 PM |
Should I soak this? | sevans1979 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-13-2013 07:08 PM |
Anyone know what I can soak this in... | JMANOS | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-02-2012 10:12 AM |