![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Why would anyone sell a sports card without showing the back or at least mentioning the back is clean or centered. I have noticed experienced dealers doing this and just wonder if it is laziness or something to hide.
__________________
Tony Biviano |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's always only one of those two options that I assume.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Completely agree.
__________________
James Ingram Successful net54 purchases from/trades with: Tere1071 (twice), Bocabirdman (5 times), 8thEastVB, GoldenAge50s, IronHorse2130, Kris19 (twice), G1911, dacubfan, sflayank, Smanzari, bocca001, eliminator, ejstel, lampertb, rjackson44 (twice), Jason19th, Cmvorce, CobbSpikedMe, Harliduck, donmuth, HercDriver, Huck, theshleps, horzverti, ALBB, lrush |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Generally it's big sellers being lazy or small sellers hiding something, is my experience. I am sure there are many instances the other way too but those are my thoughts.
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've seen this lately even with pricey graded vintage on eBay. I guess the assumption is that if there is a grade on the slab, that's enough to infer what quality the back is or is not, even without seeing it. Yes - lazy.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all- I'll start by saying I don't sell cards on ebay, which seems to be the
focus thus far. I do discuss cards privately with many on this site, which includes transmitted images. I live rurally and don't have lightning-fast internet speeds. I also tend to send fairly lengthy lists of cards. I leave it up to the other person to indicate interest based on the list, then will transmit images depending on their level of interest. I can say for sure that I have never- and that's literal, meaning not once- failed to provide any image because I had "something to hide". Laziness? Since I'm frequently the initiator of card talks, I think that word doesn't fit either. If I send a net54 member a list of 15 cards for sale/trade, I'm not going to greatly increase the workload by including 30 pictures (front and back) for a member who might reply that they have no interest in any on the list regardless of pictures. Should that person tell me they want images of cards "x,y, and z", then I provide them happily. Context is key. Now, if an interested collector asks for images and the holder doesn't provide them, that's a red flag. Again, the context tells the story. Trent King |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My favorite is when a card with a back variation is listed, even mentioning the variation in the title. Yet no back scan is provided.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And it also bugs me when the card shown has a back scan and shows a print variation I'm looking for but then I see the photo is a "stock" photo and not the actual card you will receive. A few times I asked if I could get the exact card shown but I usually don't recieve a response. Mike |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
too many sellers on ebay offer no descriptions and do not point out flaws (front or back) that cannot be seen on the scans or pictures provided, most of which are mediocre to poor...I stay away from these sellers unless I know them or they have respond to my ebay messages/questions, many of whom do not do that either
Bruce Perry |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I did not know people actually looked at the backs of cards. Figured it was the label and nothing but the label.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think SGC provides a blanket public link to images based on cert #. I think they are available only in the submitter's account.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 07-07-2022 at 11:53 AM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did not know people actually looked at the backs of cards. Figured it was the label and nothing but the label.[/QUOTE]
Really? Is this sarcasm? ‘Asks Sheldon’ No, but really. Was this a serious comment? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Moved to correct thread- Trent King
Last edited by ClementeFanOh; 07-07-2022 at 12:39 PM. Reason: wrong thread |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And...PSA is providing scans for all cards graded at the Econ service level and above. Sorry if I mislead the public to suggest even cards valued at $75 would be scanned.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Really? Is this sarcasm? ‘Asks Sheldon’ No, but really. Was this a serious comment?[/QUOTE] It was seriously sarcastic.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 07-07-2022 at 03:02 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A little disappointment rant | lug-nut | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 76 | 08-19-2015 04:59 PM |
Brief Rant | 4k6 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-21-2012 12:07 PM |
Another BCS rant | pariah1107 | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 23 | 01-10-2012 02:02 PM |
VCP rant | vintagetoppsguy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 10-31-2011 11:14 AM |
my rant of the day | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-19-2001 05:31 PM |