 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-11-2022, 08:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
C'mon PSA!
I know the grading companies have made lots of mistakes in dating boxing cards, as our own Mr. Warshaw can attest to...but to be about 10-15 years off on a relatively modern issue is pretty sad.
For any Muhammad Ali completists out there. This one is likely a mid-90's issue. Not even close on the flip. It's not a one off either. I've seen this issue and off-shoots of it, dated all over the place due to some of the backs created with fantasy dates put on them. https://www.ebay.com/itm/29491622245...wAAOSwx01h~YUL https://www.ebay.com/itm/29491622278...0AAOSwX7lh~YlQ 
Last edited by D. Bergin; 04-11-2022 at 08:33 AM. 
|
|
#2
04-11-2022, 09:15 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've always shaken my head at the crap and disinformation on PSA flips. My 'favorites' are the cards from non-English speaking areas that PSA names with whatever they are told, even if it makes no sense in translation.
 They labeled this 1967 Crack Sport as "Figuritas Sport", which literally means "sports card". At least they got the year right. Now that they've populated their system with the error, it propagates. They got the 1965s correct.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 04-11-2022 at 09:24 AM.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
