![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm working on a 1952T Low Number set (VG/EX) and am down to needing six cards out of the first 310. I'm going to set the Mays aside for this discussion, so that leaves five with one of them being the highly sought after, yet seemingly common #1 Pafko.
I've got a saved eBay search for the five and it usually seems like the results are flooded with Pafkos. I did the numbers, and here are the results showing the number of cards that are available on eBay this morning (12/22): Pafko - 86 Avila - 23 Palica - 23 Boyer - 10 Murray - 43 I know everyone says "the Pafko is tough in high condition because he was the top of the stack being #1 and always took the brunt of the violence that was wrought upon baseball cards in the 1950s." So my question is "Why do all the Pafkos carry this premium?" VG/EX examples are certainly not scarce or even difficult to find, yet they are 10-15x the price of similar condition/player/team/series cards. Excuse me for howling at the moon, but it just chafes me a bit to drop that much coin on a common card.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 1952 Topps low numbers | jasonc | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 03-13-2021 11:56 AM |
FS: 1952 Topps PSA 6 Low Numbers | 1952boyntoncollector | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 09-16-2020 07:23 AM |
FS: 1952 Topps Hi Numbers PSA 7 | jtschantz | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-20-2018 11:49 PM |
F/S : 1952 Topps low numbers | doug.goodman | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 10-10-2012 09:49 PM |
1952-1964 Topps HOFers and 1952 Topps High Numbers *NEW ADDITIONS--PRICES REDUCED* | poorlydrawncat | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 07-22-2012 12:44 PM |