![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The title says it all. Just starting my first vintage project (postwar). I know how much weight is given to centering on the front, but does the back matter at all? Within reason, of course.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't care much about the back at all. I actually target cards with back "issues", but otherwise really nice fronts. Whether its off center, miscut, or wax issues, the only real downside to cards is the technical grade.
Not post-war vintage, but this T206 McGraw fits the bill with a miscut back. And the 58 Brooks looks like a 5, but there's a bit of wax on the back. ![]() ![]()
__________________
Bought from: orioles93, JK, Chstrite, lug-nut, Bartholomew_Bump_Bailey, IgnatiusJReilly, jb67, dbfirstman, DeanH3, wrm, Beck6 Sold to: Sean1125, sayitaintso, IgnatiusJReilly, hockeyhockey, mocean, wondo, Casey2296, Belfast1933, Yoda, Peter_Spaeth, hxcmilkshake, kaddyshack, OhioCardCollector, Gorditadogg, Jay Wolt, ClementeFanOh, JollyElm, EddieZ, 4reals, uyu906 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Depends on the set, but PSA allows for even Mint 9 cards to have up to 90/10 back centering, and 10's can be as bad as 75/25.
Some sets (like 1955 Bowman) have such narrow back borders that even miscut cards will not usually get miscut qualifiers.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Personally, the more miscut the better. I'll pay a premium for a terribly miscut card because they are cool.
Investors don't read the back and grades care less, it matters less when it comes to $$$, but not completely irrelevant. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL Sometimes a thing can be so bad.........it's good!
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That’s the perfect description of my pile of beaters, miscuts, misprints and other cardboard travesties!
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I call those mullet cards. Business in front, party in the back.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A good set to look at to judge how much back centering matters and affects the cards grade is 1951 topps. You can find 7s and 8s that are flawless but have terrible back centering. I’m not sure if this is exclusively tough for 51 but I think its a good indicator.
__________________
I have done deals with many of the active n54ers. Sometimes I sell cool things that you don't see every day. My Red Schoendienst collection- https://imageevent.com/lucas00/redsc...enstcollection |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
lol. +1
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Depends on your goals. If you are picking nits over condition, or trying to get a raw card into a PSA 8-9-10 slab, you have to be concerned. If not, it is purely whatever you find appealing. I look for minty o/c cards with the o/c being the back. Some of my favorite cards are like that and I bought them for far less than their better centered cousins as a result.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wait a second............, a 9 grade can have 90/10 centering while a 10 grade can have 75/25 centering? Am I missing something, or do you possibly have that backwards?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the solid input, everyone.
Focusing on mid-grade PSA (5-7). I am not overly particular with the back, but after seeing some gorgeous copies on the front only to see 90/10 or even 95/5 on the reverse is a bit of a letdown. Can’t unsee it, really. The goal is to build a mid-long term PC, but the day will come when I’ll probably want to sell. Just thinking about how much (if any) deterrent rough backs would be. All depends on the buyer, I’m sure. Thanks again! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It matters what you care about. Most 5-7 grade collectors I have come across, including myself, don’t care much about back centering. In fact it can even benefit you because the grader will slightly impair the card for being off center and the card might otherwise be strong for the assigned grade. It really comes down to what defects you prefer because unless you are buying 8-10 your cards will be flawed. Even the 8-10s will be flawed much of the time.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
75/25 means that one border is 3x the width of the other side's border. 90/10 means that one border is 9x the width of the other side's border. So 75/25, while ugly centering, is much better than 90/10. Here's a good thread: https://forums.collectors.com/discus...e-to-centering
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 11-15-2021 at 06:06 PM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't know about registry bait type cards, but I know for upper midgrade or even like PSA 7, they sometimes ignore the rules on back centering. I have a '66 Koufax that should have gotten the MC qualifier because of the back - PSA gave it a straight 6. Personally as long as the back is mostly there, I could give a flip about back centering.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If the back is going to bother you and make you think about it, don't buy it. I don't like major wax on back or poor centering back. And def. not writing or paper loss.
Last edited by mintacular; 11-16-2021 at 04:19 PM. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The back caused this beautiful Yogi to be deemed o/c, which caused me to (very happily!!) pick it up at a nice discount...
1961berra425.jpg
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
None.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How much does condition matter on a rare card | tkd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 02-19-2021 10:35 PM |
Pete Rose Rookie Card Centering Question | deken | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 01-18-2013 12:07 AM |
An eBay problem and call for advice from a quasi-neophyte | H_T_Davis | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 48 | 04-07-2010 10:28 PM |
Question for Dr. Muchinsky (and anyone else, for that matter) | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 05-07-2008 09:39 AM |
Does cleaning a card matter? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 02-11-2005 02:56 PM |