![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which do you like best? | |||
T205 Cobb SGC 80 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
64 | 49.61% |
T205 Cobb PSA 4.5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
65 | 50.39% |
Voters: 129. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Easy question. Which of these do you like best?
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-20-2021 at 10:27 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if i vote 4.5, can i buy it?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
LOL....after what I had to pay for it you wouldn't want it. Both of these will reside in my collection....probably permanently or until I sell my collection again (I have no reason to at this time. )
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would take either card.
Not an easy question. Both cards look really good I am not sure I can pick one over the other. If I had to choose I would probably pick the 4.5
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1915 Cracker Jack Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like the 4.5. Wear on the bottom corners is less pronounced and the text on the back is sharper. But they're both beautiful cards.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like the look of the front better on the psa
__________________
HOFAutoRookies.com |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The 4.5, because it has a little more of an "I'm an old card that still looks nice" vibe vs. "I'm an old card that is trying too hard to look like a shiny new card", which, whether or not it has been tampered with (not saying that it has been and probably hasn't), still always leaves a negative impression in my lower condition brain.
Brian |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you're a flip freak, then PSA. If you only care about the higher numerical grade then SGC. Perhaps the question should be about subjectivity and which card is felt to be most accurately graded.
If there was a huge difference in price, I'd take the PSA4.5 card.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
4.5 easy choice for me. Both great cards
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Are the borders of the PSA 4.5 that much shinier than the SGC 6 or is it just the pictures?
__________________
194/240 1933 Goudeys (Ruth #144, #149, Gehrig #92) 131/208 T205s 42/108? Diamond Stars |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is a better scan for that purpose. The SGC one is further down the holder but they are the same height. Pretty close on the borders.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
for me. The visible touches on the bottom corners of the 6 puts the 4.5 ahead all day, every day.
__________________
I have been a Net 54 member since 2009 and have an Ebay store since 1998 https://www.ebay.com/usr/favorite_things Cards for sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185900663@N07/albums I am actively buying and selling vintage sports cards graded and raw. Feedback as a buyer: https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=297262 I am accepting select private consignments of quality vintage cards (raw or graded) and collecting "want" lists for higher end ($1K+) vintage cards. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It might still be the scans, but the coloring on the 4.5 seems more intense and I'd prefer it for that reason. (Either would still be a bit of an upgrade over my SGC 4.)
__________________
194/240 1933 Goudeys (Ruth #144, #149, Gehrig #92) 131/208 T205s 42/108? Diamond Stars |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Both cards are beautiful and would be stoked to own either one. We are definitely nitpicking at this point. However, the 4.5 has a little bit of a tilt to it. I feel like I’m trying to decide who is more beautiful, Christy Brinkley or Elizabeth Hurley. I guess I’d sell whichever one brings back the most $$ since they are so close in eye appeal.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Defintely the PSA 4.5
__________________
Favorite MLB quote. " I knew we could find a place to hide you". Lee Smith talking about my catching abilities at Cubs Fantasy camp. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The corners look better on the 4.5 but I like the look of of the back of the 6 looks cleaner IMO then the 4.5 But again both are great cards. but the 4.5 being in a PSA may sell for more if they were both in the same auction
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1915 Cracker Jack Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Both cards are beautiful. I would take the PSA 4.5 over the SGC 6
__________________
Thanks Chuck Drum Daddy, "10 Drum's and counting" Green Cobb’s, “7 and counting “ Red Cobb’s, “12 and counting” Working on my Ruth, Cobb, Joe Jackson, Gehrig, Wagner, Mantle collection |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Tyrus has more rosy cheeks on the 4.5, and I love rosy cheeks.
__________________
Looking for Ty Cobb W.B.Jarvis items. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
At first glance, I prefer the 4.5. But a PSA 4.5 could conceivably have a small crease or surface wrinkle which fails to show up in the scan. The SGC card (in that 6 grade) could not have a crease.
So based on the images, it's definitely the 4.5, but in-hand it might be the SGC 6.... Just because creases are a deal-breaker for me personally. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I had to go back and forth on these a few times before finally settling on the 4.5.
I wouldn't kick either of them out of bed though ![]()
__________________
Tony A. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The bottom part of the 6 looks better than the bottom part of the 4.5. Tough call..
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-23-2021 at 12:45 PM. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Assuming it's not a difference in scanner settings, the PSA 4.5 due to the more vivid colors.
__________________
successful deals with hcv123, rholmes, robw1959, Yankees1964, theuclakid, Brian Van Horn, h2oya311, thecapeleague, Gkoz316, chesbro41, edjs, wazoo, becollie, t206kid, vintageismygame, Neal, bradmar48, iconsportscards, wrapperguy, agrebene, T3fan, T3s, ccre, Leon, wolf441, cammb, tonyo, markf31,gonzo,scmavl & others currently working on: E101 (33/50) T3 set (104/104), complete! T205 set (108/221) '33 Goudey collecting W600s, Walter Johnson Last edited by chadeast; 10-20-2021 at 02:44 PM. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Question--so which Cobb is worth more dollars--the SGC 6 or PSA 4.5?
Last edited by Directly; 10-20-2021 at 04:08 PM. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess I'd have to go with the PSA because that's a PREMIUM 1 $1000/card case it's in.
![]() |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like the SGC 6 better.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The 4.5 looks much more vivid, for that reason that would be my choice.
__________________
Successful transactions with: Chesboro41, jimivintage, Bocabirdman, marcdelpercio, Jollyelm, Smanzari, asoriano, pclpads, joem36, nolemmings, t206blogcom, Northviewcats, Xplainer, Kickstand19, GrayGhost, btcarfango, Brian Van Horn, USMC09, G36, scotgreb, tere1071, kurri17, wrm, David James, tjenkins, SteveWhite, OhioCard Collector, sysks22, ejstel. Marty |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’d take the SGC.
But I’d also like to acquire the 4.5 for my 4 and some cash 😂 |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC 6
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sgc 6
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Easy choice for me, the SGC has less wear, I would take that one first.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a centering freak, both pass muster to me. Only then do I look at the back, and the SGC wins there pretty easily.
Last edited by slightlyrounded; 10-20-2021 at 07:17 PM. |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It yawl look at the numbers in the poll they are almost dead even. And if I vote for the 6 it would be even (as of a few minutes ago). I haven't voted because I don't know!! And that is how I ended up with 2.
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-21-2021 at 07:31 AM. |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd choose the psa example due to stronger bolder image and perfect focus/registry.
The sgc appears to have a slight color shift and throws off the image detail just a bit, and washed out colors compared to the psa example. But either would look nice in my binder ![]()
__________________
Collection on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/139478047@N03/albums |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My SGC 4, which I've had since the late 1990s:
__________________
194/240 1933 Goudeys (Ruth #144, #149, Gehrig #92) 131/208 T205s 42/108? Diamond Stars |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The PSA, by a long shot, if the images accurately reflect the color. It's a bolder image, and the back stock is less toned, in the images at least. The SGC is also a little off register (note the ear, cap).
In my eyes, corners and borders are there to 1) take damage and leave the image crisp and 2) hide the fact that cutting sheets isn't perfect. Image quality > border and corner wear, though these two are pretty similar their anyways. As a low grade broke loser collector, that the hobby doesn't care that much about the actual card image in general is a very nice thing. Last edited by G1911; 10-21-2021 at 12:17 PM. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a sub topic, how about a poll of the T205 Tyrus with backs other than Piedmont or SC? I have one: a SGC4 with an American Beauty-Green. Sorry, as usual, no scan.
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I chose the 4.5 with the caveat that it gets reholdered in an SGC flip. I think it presents some much nicer without the red and white billboard distraction.
__________________
"If you ever discover the sneakers for far more shoes in your everyday individual, and also have a wool, will not disregard the going connected with sneakers by Isabel Marant a person." =AcellaGet |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As it stands it is 55 votes for the SGC 80 and 54 votes for the PSA 4.5....and I haven't voted
![]() Thanks to all who voted so far btw, John S, any member can do a poll, just sayin'.... ![]() .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like the SGc better. The rounded corners make the PSA inferior despite the better color and registration. The SGC color and registration are generally ok on their own but look worse next to the PSA.
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I chose the PSA only because it looks brighter with better color than the SGC. I prefer cards in SGC holders but if I'm just look at the cards, I like the one that just happens to be in a PSA holder.
.
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble Blog: Click Here |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
amazing that the 2 different grades and it pretty much is a split decision.
Regardless Leon you have 2 nice cards. And any one of us would love to have either one in our collections
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1915 Cracker Jack Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Both are really nice, but I prefer the PSA simply because of the sharp registration. Maybe it's because I just woke up, but I feel a little cross-eyed when I look at the SGC version.
__________________
158 successful b/s/t transactions My collection: https://www.instagram.com/collectingbrooklyn/ |
#45
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd take the SGC 6. It has better centering and the corner differences are negligible to me. The slight tilt on the 4.5 would drive me nuts, and the back of the 6 is considerably better than the 4.5. But both are great cards either way!
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Both are great cards. I like the 4.5 a little bit better, but I don't think you could go wrong with either one.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1933 Goudey Ruth, Gehrig, T205 Wallace 1-line, T205 Cobb!!! | Runscott | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 02-26-2013 09:46 PM |
FS; T205 McGraw SGC 60, T206 Cobb Tolstoi SGC 10, T205 Dahlen PSA 4.5 | Ladder7 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 09-21-2011 04:41 PM |
lower price! t206's, t205's, t205 cobb, w. johnson,'53 psa 2 mantle + for only $900 | benderbroeth | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 15 | 07-14-2011 07:33 AM |
WTB: T202 Cobb; T205 Young; Colgan Cobb | David R | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 05-21-2010 06:30 PM |
Accepting Offers T205 Cobb MathewsonT206 Cobb Green and Red | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 01-12-2009 04:17 PM |