![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your opinion and why please.
Thanks. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That card looks fake in my opinion. It's the printing that looks wrong. It looks like that was scanned and then printed on a computer printer. You could compare the dot pattern if you had it in hand. I guess you'd say the printing looks fuzzy. Look at the dot pattern of the shadow under the bill of his cap. Also the dark black lettering of New York Yankees looks narrower and less defined. Compare that version to the printing on this graded example.
Last edited by GasHouseGang; 06-24-2021 at 03:22 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Something looks off, the corners are too good also, thanks.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
At first glance, it just seems completely fake. And it's way too thin side to side, so it doesn't measure out correctly. Whoever cut it certainly didn't hold the ruler firmly enough while brandishing his X-Acto knife. Look at all the sloping above the team name on back. I would run away faster than Mickey with two good knees!!!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I recently bought a 56 Mick reprint for my binder (my real card is graded)...and this card looks like my reprint. The back has the color shade of the reprint and as Darren said, cut doesnt look right. The reprints are getting better and better but there is still that look if you know what I mean. I personally would not buy that card...unless it was the same 3 bucks i paid for my binder card.
Front borders are too white, back is too bright.
__________________
John Otto 1963 Fleer - 1981-90 Fleer/Donruss/Score/Leaf Complete 1953 - 1990 Topps/Bowman Complete 1953-55 Dormand SGC COMPLETE SGC AVG Score - 4.03 1953 Bowman Color - 110/160 69% Last edited by Harliduck; 06-24-2021 at 04:10 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The image looks xeroxed. Anything more than $5, and you are going to get your feelings hurt.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
51B Mantle raw - is this is probably real or fake | Canofcorn | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 09-22-2017 06:23 PM |
Mantle-real or fake? | whammer33024 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 16 | 06-11-2017 09:41 AM |
Real or Fake 52 mantle? | PGAprocollector | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 01-13-2016 11:43 AM |
is this 52 Mantle real or fake please | forazzurri2axz | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 07-22-2012 12:56 PM |
Real Or Fake 52 topps Mantle | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 09-04-2007 12:21 AM |