![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey, wanted to get input on how PSA treats paperloss on vintage cards. I have a 1949 Bowman Jackie Robinson card in an SGC holder, thinking about sending it to PSA. If anyone wants to straight-up guess what grade PSA would give it, that's cool, but I'm mostly just looking to get input on what the paper loss on the back would "cap" the grade at. Thanks!
Back: ![]() Front: ![]() Surface wrinkle on the front: ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I had to guess I’d say no higher than a 2. I haven’t been around too long but I don’t recall seeing a card with paper loss graded higher than a 2. Maybe they’d bump it to 2.5?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It’s painful to reduce so much for that, but I’m thinking they gave a 1 or 1.5 for this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
2 at best, probably a 1.5, but it's a nice looking 1.5
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Generally, I've seen PSA knock a card with paper loss like that down to a PSA 1.5. If they are feeling generous you might get a PSA 2.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1.5 for a really nice card (like yours), but a 1 for most. I have never seen 2 with paper loss. Nice Jackie.
__________________
Always looking for PSA Graded 1952 Topps: 1-80 PSA 7 81-310 PSA 8 311-407 PSA 6 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks everyone for the input. You guys are all sharp, this card is currently in an SGC 1.5 holder hah. I'll probably end up keeping it as is, but was curious about crossover potential. Thanks!
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It has none...it is probably worth more in a PSA holder than an SGC holder, but don't expect any gifts.....PSA grades paper loss pretty harshly....but don't fret...you will still be able to ask a premium price because the card looks so nice.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have seen PSA 5's with paper loss on the image (mostly T206s in old holders). But I immediately thought PSA 1.5 when I saw this one.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heck, you can get 6's with Paper loss even! There seems to be paper loss for every grade imaginable.
|
![]() |
Tags |
1949, 1949 bowman, bowman, jackie robinson |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grading Q: Paper Loss | sickmantz | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 11-17-2016 12:02 PM |
PSA 5 with paper loss? | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 01-05-2012 06:34 PM |
Paper loss on front > SGC 20? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 04-23-2008 03:54 PM |
fixing paper loss...or not | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-18-2007 05:17 PM |
paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 02:09 AM |