![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, let’s assume you can only pick one of the following high-end Roger Clemens for your collection - which do YOU think retains its value better?
1984 Fleer Update PSA 9 Clemens Or 1985 Donruss PSA 10 Clemens I never buy 10’s... but since both of these are about equal cost now, trying to decide which is the better purchase. Thx for input... I rarely buy newer cards and thought some crowd-sourcing input from experienced modern card collectors might help clear up my choice Jeff |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would also pick fleer of those two
But I would much rather have a 1985 Tiffany PSA 9. I believe there is only a total of 14-1500 graded and 300 ish in PSA 9 and around 50 PSA 10 Fleer has approx 5200 graded with 2400 ish in PSA 9 and approx 500 psa 10....just my 2 cents ![]()
__________________
Collecting: Sandy Koufax "Left Arm of God"
Last edited by gustomania; 12-03-2020 at 04:44 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
seconded. ben is a smart guy
Last edited by hockeyhockey; 12-03-2020 at 05:24 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here’s another opinion because it’s sometimes hard for me to stay in the parameters of the debate. I really like his tcma rookie and think it’s a good value. I also like the 84 update and that would be my vote otherwise.
Just noticed ben felt the same. Lol. I have two of every Clemens rookie and am always hunting for more at the right price. Last edited by Econteachert205; 12-03-2020 at 05:45 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is another thread in this section that takes a stab at card production numbers over the years by various brands.
For the 1984 Fleer Update, they have production estimated at 12,000. For the 1985 Donruss, production is estimated at 450,000. Edited to add: The 1985 Topps Tiffany production run is estimated at 5,000. I would take the Fleer of the two from the OP's question. Might also consider the Tiffany, but I don't know what one is going for. I really don't understand the premium on a '10' over a '9', given the fact that you cannot distinguish the difference without the aid of magnification. It's just the TPGs creating artificial scarcity via their subjective grading IMHO.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) Last edited by Bigdaddy; 12-03-2020 at 09:29 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Fleer Update is his RC. End of discussion.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1970 Topps HIGH NUMBERS - Your Choice - ALL SOLD! | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 01-09-2017 02:48 PM |
SOLD!! 1985T CLEMENS & McGWIRE RC'S! HIGH GRADE SGC'S! Ends Sun 5-24! | GoldenAge50s | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 7 | 05-25-2015 08:07 AM |
F/S: High Grade HOF & Future HOF RC's: Brady, Young, Rice, Favre, Clemens, Tiger & more | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-27-2008 06:42 PM |
F/S: High Grade HOF & Future HOF RC's: Brady, Young, Rice, Favre, Clemens, Tiger & more | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 2 | 11-24-2008 04:58 PM |
ok....high grade or rare? whats your choice? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 09-20-2007 12:23 PM |