![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm looking at picking up something where the registration is off. Does this hurt the overall resale value typically and does it affect grading at all?
__________________
Tanner Jones - Author, Confessions of a Baseball Card Addict - Available on Amazon www.TanManBaseballFan.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes and yes. Would lose some eye appeal collectors on the money side. Could lead to a reduction in grade or the rarer OF qualifier for Out of Focus, but that would be only if the card is a higher grade card; say maybe PSA 6 or above in the first place. Mid grade cards don't seem to get downgraded for registration issues as much.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is all about eye appeal for the majority of 19th century collectors but grade still affects it somewhat, from what I have seen. The photo quality is what those collectors want, not necessarily the highest graded. I am positive there are exceptions to the rule though. When I have bought or collected those it was always more about eye appeal than grade.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 03-21-2019 at 12:53 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Registration typically isn't the issue on 19th century cards as many are photographic. What is often a problem is fading. Either way, visual appeal is the key, and for some collectors the only factor that matters. I would take a sharp photo card with rounded corners and back issues over an SGC 80+ with a faded photo every time.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I presume he's talking about lithograph cards like Ginter's Champions or Goodwins.
Although the 1910 T202 card he posted in the other thread is definitely poorly registered and I would not expect it to get a PSA 8 if submitted today.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Tanner Jones - Author, Confessions of a Baseball Card Addict - Available on Amazon www.TanManBaseballFan.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In real estate, my profession, there's a saying that goes "location, location, location". My analogy for 19th century photographic baseball collecting-- be it cards, CdVs, cabinets, imperial cabinets or mammoth plates, is "photo quality, photo quality, photo quality".
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
19th Century Team Cabinets - Your Thoughts | Bosox Blair | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 04-28-2014 02:51 PM |
Thoughts on this 19th century oddball piece | aquarius31 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-06-2012 12:31 PM |
FS 19th Century Cards | dwinters | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 3 | 05-31-2012 09:24 AM |
19th century poster advertising Goodwin's 19th century baseball cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 04-22-2009 05:58 AM |
Is this a 19th century copy of an illustration from a 19th century book ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-06-2004 04:47 PM |