![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When I first looked at this Mitchell card I thought at some point it had
been marked with a black marker. Mitchell.jpg But after a little research it turns out the mark occurred during the printing process. Mitchell With Black Mark.jpg SGC doesn't put MK qualifiers on the their cards but if this card was sent to PSA for a crossover it would most likely receive a MK qualifier and rightfully so. Even under magnification you can't tell that it occurred during the printing process. Last edited by Pat R; 10-26-2018 at 07:27 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree it might get an MK but of course you are correct. Lots of those examples out there and they probably go both ways. But most times I would think a TPG won't do the legwork and just slap MK on the flip or lower the grade as it is one.
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-26-2018 at 07:48 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1962 Post Canadian Baseball Card Production | keepmeposted | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 32 | 02-27-2024 09:28 PM |
Post Production Transfer | t206hound | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 08-23-2014 01:23 AM |
I crossed the 1000th post mark! | t206blogcom | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 06-08-2013 09:18 PM |
Football card production question | skelly | Football Cards Forum | 2 | 01-13-2013 07:10 PM |
T210 Old Mill Card Production | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-26-2006 10:49 AM |