![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will start off by saying I don't usually get to post on this side of the board, so I get excited when I finally pick up something really old and cool.
Last year, I was lucky enough to acquire a real Sockalexis post card for my Maine collection. I never thought I would get one of those. I sent it off to SGC (mostly for the protective case) and, I got a pretty good grade (SGC 30). Since the population is 1, I would say that I got the highest graded Sock in the world. Lol. A month ago, I saw there was a guy selling a pile of postcards on ebay. In that pile was ANOTHER Sock post card. Except he didn't mention it. And it looked GOOD. Obviously, some others saw it too, because I paid up for it. Then the seller asked me if I was a Sockalexis fan after I won; which made me wonder why he didn't mention it in the listing. So that was weird. The plan was to send it in, make sure it is legit, upgrade, and sell my old one. But I got it in hand, and it is BEAUTIFUL. I actually became slightly alarmed because it looked too good. I sent it off to SGC immediately, and got good news, and bad news. The good news is, it is authentic. The bad news is, they didn't grade it. So I emailed and asked. They replied and wanted to see it again. So, I sent it off again, and just got it back today. There is a little note with it that says "TRM Top Edge". And it is still a grade of "A". I have measured this thing six ways from Sunday, and for the life of me I cannot see it. Both cards are exactly 8.5 cm wide and 13.7 cm long. I even resorted to counting the shingles on the top of the barn (now my eyes kind of hurt). Has anyone ever had any experience with card coming up short, but you think it is not? When the experts trim, is it impossible to tell? In any event, I am really bummed, BUT this card is so awesome, I think this is the one I will end up keeping, and I suppose I will sell my other one. One (or all?) of you guys once told me, buy the card, not the holder, so yeah, I get it. But my OCD is bugging the heck out of me. Well, I am off to measure it one more time... |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The left border is the difference to my eye.
ETA: fantastic piece either way. Last edited by terjung; 02-24-2018 at 04:22 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oddly there is less image on the right side as you lok at it on the trimmed one. look at the gentleman who is almost completely cut off in the top one, he is half there in the other one.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sean, I was an under bidder on that lot. It would not concern me in the least. I would take your authentic one every time, the Bangor shop stamp on back only adds to the appeal. If I were you I'd bust it out of that encapsulation and simply enjoy it for the beauty it is. Grading simply does not translate to postcards, particularly RPPCs. I actually prefer posted postcards which grade Poor every time. Enjoy your find!
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() Best bet would to be look at the edge under magnification and look for any difference in the edges. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh, I almost forgot.
In hand, the left side has less of the guy, but the right side seems to have more fence. But my buddy said it was normal for the actual image to vary slightly on these things. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I guess that settles it for me, I am keeping this one! I have never seen the one with Bangor shop stamp on the back until now, but I did think that was cool. I am going to keep it in the case, because I am paranoid something might happen to it if I don't! Thank you for your help. Sean |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice PCs...honestly, if it were me, Id keep 'em both.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hahahaha. Yes, I did think of that.
But, uhhhhh...the home accounting office didn't like that idea, if you know what I mean. ![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Many of us report to a similar office I'm sure.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can never have enough inventory in the warehouse is what you tell the accounting office... lol
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Home accounting office says the inventory is spilling into the kitchen...
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is an appeals process for this as well, just fill out the forms and make sure she gets something nice.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh, believe me, I was reminded of those forms just about an hour ago. Lol.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Good point. I hadn't noticed that.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice PC's! The type collector in me says to do the same thing.
__________________
Current projects: White Sox prewar type set White Sox T206 Master set 1952 Topps set |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Me too, they are different. I love the backstamp too!!
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So you were the guy who outbid me on the postcard on ebay
![]()
__________________
Be sure to check out my site www.RMYAuctions.com |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() I have seen at least three variations of this card. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nice sock drawer. | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-11-2017 09:46 AM |
T205 Dougherty Red Sock SGC 50 FS | soxinseven | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 11-07-2013 09:33 AM |
OT: Opinion requested - to trim or not to trim? | tschock | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-27-2013 01:20 PM |
FS: T205 Dougherty White Sock emblem PSA 3 | jtschantz | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 08-11-2011 07:48 AM |
T205 Dougherty White Sock - Sovereign - SGC50 - $175 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 03-19-2009 12:40 PM |