![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Picked this up in a deal this week and know little to nothing about T206s. I would appreciate your thoughts?
Thanks in advance, Chris |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Real, but trimmed on the bottom border.
__________________
Please visit my website at http://t206.monkberry.com/index.html |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
100% real.
__________________
"Chicago Cubs fans are 90% scar tissue". -GFW |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I also agree that it's real, but I disagree that it's trimmed. Why would someone trim a creased card?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Top looks trimmed as well. But, yes, it's looks real.
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble Blog: Click Here |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
im in the def real but likely trimmed camp.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's definitely real, and clearly trimmed. The bottom didn't jump out at me as quickly as the top did, though.
I took the card in Photoshop, justified it along the left edge, and added in a few thin pencil lines. It jumps out more with these. The two edges on the side are nice and smooth, what I'd expect from a card of this condition. The bottom, especially the bottom right, shows some fraying that's not consistent with the factory cutting. But the top is most obvious. There's some minor fraying again, but the edge is horribly miscut. Look at the bowing. Unless that's the result of the top being smooshed down, somehow, it just wouldn't look like that. And I see no evidence of any paper compression from the scans. ![]() It's a nice card if you're just keeping it for yourself, but if you ever tried to sell it, you should clearly document your concerns. Any buyer should know that it's been altered. But the card presents nicely, imo, overall with the trimming caveat.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cards are not only trimmed for nefarious purposes. Kids trimmed them 100 years ago for a million different reasons. Collectors up until fairly recently trimmed them just to make them look nicer or fit with a collection without thought to monetary considerations. I have seen any number of trimmed creased cards and even a few absolute dogs that were trimmed.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Real and I believe the top is trimmed.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Real, and I believe it to be trimmed across the middle.
Brian |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 cobb real? | Econteachert205 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-12-2014 04:31 PM |
Help with T206 -- Real or Reprint | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-12-2008 05:31 AM |
Dot pattern on real T206's | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-09-2006 01:34 PM |
T206: Real or Fake? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-03-2005 01:24 AM |
Are these real (t206's) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-16-2004 09:08 PM |