![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is for those that have PSA or SGC grade cards and submit some raw cards they buy. These cards are to be for sale. So my question is, based on their condition, do you think it is worth it to send them off to be graded? I have a voucher for 15 cards which I can include these or wait until the next submission special. For those that deal, primarily with PSA, how do you decide if a card is worth submitting?
What do you see the grade for these two being? Lastly, my plan right now is to submit them, but a reasonable offer may just change my mind. So if there are any of you that prefer raw cards and these fit with what you collect, feel free to make me an offer and I will certainly consider it quickly. My plan is to have the submission ready to go Thurs or Fri. Thank you for your input Chris |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think you're probably looking at a PSA 3 (MC) on the Banks (value about $225) and a 2/2.5 on the Williams ($75-100; There looks to be a mark or indention right above a pinhole, but I can't really tell)
Last edited by Jayjones82; 08-29-2017 at 04:11 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with Jason's grades but with those cards, if anything, if they come back with those numbers, at least they will prove they are authentic, which will definitely make them more saleable.
Good luck.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
On the Banks, I've measured it and came up with .75 to 1 mm on the top and only 3 mm on the bottom border. At .75/3 that would make it 80/20, so it should qualify, no? Am I right that you measure from the top of the player's name at the top? I don't know exactly how PSA measures or if they have an automatic rule of less than 1 mm is a miscut? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I disagree with the MC qualifier on the Banks, it has borders all the way around. I would definitely put it in the 2-3 range and I would grade it. The Williams is a 1 maybe 1.5 with the pin hole and the stain directly above it and probably not worth it.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Banks is not miscut, just off center.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with a 2-3 on the Banks. Worth grading. I would bet the Williams gets an Altered based on the filled in pinhole. Better to sell that one raw.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grade my 1954 Topps Ernie Banks Rookie | polishman | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 04-29-2016 03:12 PM |
WTB low grade 1954 Topps hockey | epike3 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 04-09-2016 09:33 PM |
WTB: Mid-Grade 1954 Topps Ernie Banks | bcbgcbrcb | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-26-2012 07:52 PM |
1954 Topps lot of 17 different mid grade | vintagetoppsguy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 10-06-2010 08:26 AM |
WTB 1954 Aaron low grade | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 01-27-2009 06:32 AM |