![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Odd that this is a VG but shows up as a PSA 4. I checked the registry and it shows VG-EX. Really odd and how does PSA screw up like this?
https://m.ebay.com/itm/1915-CRACKER-...cAAOSwPOhafjJ~ Only reason why I ask is that I saw another card, a Johnson cookies that was missing the I in mint https://m.ebay.com/itm/1954-Hank-Aar...YAAOSwA1pauuOY |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Far from an expert - I'm sure others will chime in, but that label looks fake to me. Anyone else?
Something also seems off on the Aaron - in addition to the missing "i", the barcode is "broken". I'd stay FAR AWAY! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I was told by a very knowledgable hobbyist that the plank was based on the old psa system and there wasn’t a vgex. And the Aaron was scanned using a dust removal option which affected the letter. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Edit - Found an old post that shows that style of font. http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=184419 Post 4
__________________
WTB: Autographed 1984 USFL Reggie White, 1955 Len Ford, 1986 Wilber Marshall, 1957 Johnny Unitas Last edited by pgconboy; 05-11-2018 at 11:31 PM. Reason: Gave a college try on looking into PSA fonts |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As far as the Cracker Jack Plank is concerned, I think this is an example of an early PSA graded card.
At first PSA did not have number grades on the flip. A VG card labeled as VG with no numeric grade printed. I have a program from the 1992 National in Atlanta where PSA has an ad with examples of cards labeled without numeric grade. I think this card is from the era when they first printed a numeric grade with the printed grade and there may limitations of number of characters or just general problems that were eventually fixed. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ad from 1992
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The top of the holder looks frosted. My guess is the flip is replaced and it was originally a 1.5 or something.
If that's not the case, I've never seen a PSA card graded VG 4 before. Maybe they did it in the early years, but the only times I know of where they changed their scale was to add the half grades and change PR-FR 1 to break out Poor 1 and Fair 1.5.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Very early on PSA had a different system at the lower end. VG was 4. It was poor fair good very good. It's fine.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 05-12-2018 at 11:44 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How often do you think PSA/SGC mix up the grades on two cards in a submission? | Luke | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 07-18-2015 10:18 AM |
T 206 Low grades nce cards | piedmont150 | T206 cards B/S/T | 4 | 07-21-2013 05:09 PM |
Looking for Some Star Cards in lower grades | mantlefan2010 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-13-2013 11:18 AM |
Show Grades vs Mail Grades | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-16-2008 08:34 PM |
Grades of Stained Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-26-2003 01:44 PM |