 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-19-2017, 10:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Popular, but Ugly:
There are quite a few popular cards out there - some of them are worth quite a bit of money - but look butt-ugly. For example, I have always found the 1938 Goudey Dimaggio to be an ugly card. Now I love what Goudey did with this set by putting a player's head on a tiny cartoon body. Doing that was pretty creative, but why on earth did they have to choose that specific face shot of Joe for this set? Take a look at it below:
 That's how I look like when I'm on the toilet seat.  Now I could post a few more examples, but I want everyone on here to participate. So go ahead and tell us which card you find very ugly, but nevertheless is a very popular one among collectors. Oh, and it doesn't have to be baseball either (football, hockey, boxing, etc. is fine). Last edited by samosa4u; 07-19-2017 at 10:40 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ugly (IMO) Ruth | w7imel | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 20 | 08-19-2014 10:36 PM |
| More Popular: 71 or 75 BB | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 12 | 11-08-2013 09:34 PM |
| and the ugly | Matthew80 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 21 | 12-16-2012 08:17 PM |
| Popular set, but... WHY!? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-09-2007 11:07 PM |
| They`re Ugly I Know, But...... | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 08-10-2005 05:28 PM |
Threaded Mode