![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I found this interesting, although for all I know it's common knowledge. I was looking at the back of #240 Hal Schumacher and noticed that it refers to his complete game victory for the Giants against Washington in the 1933 Series (October 4). Then I realized that #230-240 of the set are all Giants, and several of them refer to the 1933 World Series. The back of #236 Davis calls it a 5-game series so it's obviously over. That means that at least the highest numbers of the set were issued AFTER the end of the season, presumably several weeks later.
- does anybody know how late the 1933 set was issued? - Was the set originally planned to be 230 cards, and were the last ten numbers #230-240 a kind of World Series update to the set? If so, it seems like they would be much scarcer than the rest. Tim |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1933 Goudey Hack Wilson - really a 1934 issue? | gracecollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-01-2014 06:57 PM |
wtb to complete sets 1933 goudey 36 diamond stars, 35 goudey, 36 goudey, 41 goudey | asw37 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 12 | 10-04-2013 04:50 PM |
Trading a Henry Johnson signed 1933 goudey for almost any other signed 1933 goudey | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-28-2009 06:10 PM |
The National--Timing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-03-2006 08:04 PM |
How's this for some timing? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-06-2006 10:08 AM |