![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a T206 that was graded years ago, before they started labeling the correct back information on the slab. The card below is simply labeled as a "T206 Sweet Caporal" where is should now be labeled as "T206 S. Caporal 350-460/42 OP". I know I can resubmit it for reholdering, but not sure how a relabeling sub should work. Would this be considered a mechanical error even though it isn't? Will I still be charged a grading/reholder fee? I guess I can call them and ask, but wanted to see if anyone else has had to send in theirs for label correction.
![]() ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My belief is if you ask for a reholder, they will replace the label with a new lighthouse label and the now standard identification. I doubt they would consider it a mechanical error since that is how they labeled them when that card was graded.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I spoke to psa customer service. I was told to email them the information with front and back scans. Their research team would look into it and let me know if they will cover it or if I have to cover the fee.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Cool, please let us know the outcome. Thanks in advance.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with DeanH3; will cost you a reholder since it's not really an error on their part. Otherwise they'd be on the hook for millions of reholders.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
True true
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks like this was way before they identified backs. So you will have to pay. That is the policy if it was holdered before they identified back variations it is not a mechanical error and you will have to pay. This has been discussed on this forum a number of times previously.
Last edited by glynparson; 11-16-2018 at 03:19 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not sure why you want to have it reholdered.
It will most likely cost you what the card is worth after shipping costs. It might not even come back the same grade. Leave it as is. It already has the factory brand SC on the label. Just not the factory #. John P |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Depends on how many he has to send. If he can send 10 in, it would cost around $100 including return shipping.
If he sends in for reholder on this card, it would go from Pop 14, 53 Higher to Pop 1, 4 Higher. I could easily see the value of this card going up $20 or more by changing pop like that.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SOLD: T205 R. Hoblitzell - Name Correct, No Cin. Variation | asoriano | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 12-20-2014 01:24 PM |
FS: T206 Singles: Back/Printing Variation/HOF etc. | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 12-12-2007 03:09 PM |
For Sale e97 Steinfeldt SGC-30--Name correct variation | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 08-22-2007 01:41 AM |
T206 back variation price premiums | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 03-16-2007 01:42 PM |
Ok,either send em back trimmed or grade them-PSA! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 05-15-2006 02:37 PM |