![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Lots of discussions regarding approaching/building and strategies involving putting together a complete T206 set. I would like to hear more about the T205 set.
I've went through some T206 vs T205 threads, but it seems like it's more regarding what is the better "looking" set. It appears that at 208 cards, it seems like it would be easier and more affordable no? Also, is it me, or finding the individual cards for T205 seem more difficult? I assume if you were to stick with the numbered checklist 1-208 (ignoring the varations) it is not too bad? Mind you, this would be if one is pursuing a "low" grade set? How tough is it finding the tough commons vs the tough commons in the T206 set ? One thing that I've noticed that for "Complete" completion it seems much easier, of course, because of the Big 4 in the T206 set. I know the T206 also has 4 Cobbs, 3 youngs etc. etc.
__________________
Excellent people to deal with: bnorth, Republicaninmass, obcmac, marcdelpercio, Michael Peich, dougscats, jimivintage, mybuddyinc, Luke, Bocabirdman, ncinin. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
set-building approach | darwinbulldog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-11-2015 04:28 PM |
Fun With Set Building...67 Topps | Harliduck | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 32 | 04-01-2014 12:47 AM |
Building a Set... Which Way to Cross? | cozmokramer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 03-21-2011 06:15 PM |
What's your set-building strategy? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 08-15-2008 02:48 PM |
Set building experiences | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-26-2003 06:49 PM |