![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have at least 50+ cards; I am contemplating a PSA Review. Here is a few I am considering. I'm just curious if I'm just wasting money or if the cards actually ever get bumped.
Last edited by cardsnstuff; 09-19-2016 at 12:07 PM. Reason: spelling |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The centering kills the Rose...you were lucky to get a '7' on that one.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They all look pretty right to me. IMO These reviews are a scam, yeah if you send it back 20 times it might get a little bump...but is the trouble and money worth it for a card that isn't an investor target?
If you are selling there's enough people out there that play the bump game that pay a premium for cards that they think (wisely or not) that they have a chance on.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This thread should have gone in the post war section but the question, in general, applies to pre-war cards too. I think the grades look about correct also...
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There was a time where reviews were the way to go. That time is not now from my experiences and most higher volume submitters will echo that assessment.
In most instances I will simply break the card out and try it again. I will review if I am only looking for a 1/2 grade bump or if I was not the original submitter and concerned the card might not grade again since I never had the chance to examine it out of the holder. In virtually all other cases I am resubmitting raw. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reviews are for fools with $$$ to burn and a sure fire way to make JO richer.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've had some luck on reviews. Sent a group of 25 1967's that were PSA 8 and got 5 bumps to PSA 9. Crossover success is better though.
__________________
Adam Goldenberg |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crack and submit.
Much better odds than "review." |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thanks for your opinions
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
55,56 topps raw review FS | zachclose21 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 06-05-2013 07:44 PM |
PSA review results | Touch'EmAll | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 09-13-2009 08:10 AM |
The year in review | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-22-2008 04:40 PM |
PSA review question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-01-2007 11:28 PM |
Sending in for review | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 03-07-2006 01:10 PM |