![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know I am not around here much but I just did pick up my first large vintage lot which included 5 t206's that are raw. I was wondering if any experts here could help me with the grades on them (or what they think they would grade)? And also if I should be sending to PSA or SGC at this point. I always thought PSA but a lot of folks are telling me SGC is more reliable.
![]() The backs are just of the Keeler and Dahlen. Keeler is the one where you can read the label on the back of the card saver. ![]() Again, thanks in advance for any help.
__________________
Follow me on twitter - @jtradingcards and @collegepets New Project - 1983 Topps PSA 10 set - 20/792 = 2.52% complete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
it's not in the correct spot but some of them are trimmed so expect an "A" grade for authentic or altered, but by no means am i an expert
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which ones look trimmed? I am the exact opposite of an expert and would love to learn more.
__________________
Follow me on twitter - @jtradingcards and @collegepets New Project - 1983 Topps PSA 10 set - 20/792 = 2.52% complete Last edited by jtradingcards; 07-20-2016 at 09:25 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't see any trimming. I wouldn't bother with Taylor because you'll get a 1.5 and not worth the grading fees. Hickman is a 1.5/2. Magee is a 2.5. Keeler probably a 3 and 3.5 for Dahlen. Those are approximate.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Sold the Magee raw because it was a number I was OK with. Not sure if I sold too cheap, probably did, but it is what it is. Gonna definitely grade the Keeler and Dahlen.
__________________
Follow me on twitter - @jtradingcards and @collegepets New Project - 1983 Topps PSA 10 set - 20/792 = 2.52% complete |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think Keeler is a PSA 3 and a SGC 50
Dahlen is a PSA 3.5 and SGC 50 or 55 Pretty confident with those numbers, but can't guarantee it. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Keeler 3 MK
Dahlen A If selling, will the sales price increase in a slab be greater than the grading fees? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
But 50 is possible, I've seen a few 50's with corners like those. For resale PSA might be better. The registry and competitiveness give the prices a boost. (I prefer SGC, but there is usually a difference in price) Steve B |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I dont know. My business is mostly focused on modern cards so this is a whole new ballgame for me.
__________________
Follow me on twitter - @jtradingcards and @collegepets New Project - 1983 Topps PSA 10 set - 20/792 = 2.52% complete |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I can't add anymore than what Luke has already said and I agree with what he has posted.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please provide your input... | TCMA | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-14-2014 06:19 AM |
Crossing over/upgrading T206 cards. Input from collectors would be appreciated! | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 10-09-2013 06:45 PM |
Need your input | lharri3600 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 07-06-2013 09:52 AM |
Need some input on e98 set.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-11-2008 08:47 PM |
T206 HOF Calendar - Input Needed | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 01-04-2008 05:09 PM |