![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know this is a SGC dominant board, but I am surprised there has been no discussion of this new feature.
I think it's pretty cool and one ups the one decent feature of the SGC registry. I am a SGC guy, but I find myself leaning more toward PSA. Just playing around with it, I created this. http://www.psacard.com/PSASetRegistr...x?setid=183999
__________________
Tiger collector Need: E121 Veach arms folded Monster Number 520/520 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cool stuff. I used to love watching Oliver hit! Awesome!
Here is mine: http://www.psacard.com/PSASetRegistr...x?setid=178090 Peace, Mike |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is a very cool feature. I really like the look of it job well done PSA.
Last edited by Piratedogcardshows; 03-15-2015 at 02:33 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This new virtual album is a very cool feature. Reminds me of when I use to
store my cards in albums. Here's mine: http://www.psacard.com/PSASetRegistr...px?setid=43306 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it's pretty cool. I'm big into the PSA well at least my Goudey set but haven't taken the time to do the virtual album
__________________
SELLING 1934 GOUDEY PARTIAL SET---CHECK OUT THE THREAD IN B/S/T |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting concept, I sort of like it sort of don't.
I think the digital covers for the "binder" are really well done. Like REALLY. I might go back to binders for a few things if I could get real ones that nice affordably. But........The inside ![]() The window blind texture of the "pages" and the way the cards sometimes get overlapped by each other.......... While the cover says "look at me I'm special" The interior says " Actually, I'm not all that special I'm some cards in holders glued to homemade scrapbook pages" Both are really nice collections by the way. And they deserve a much better presentation. And, to get it put of the way. I'm on SGC, and prefer them because of the no membership required business model. I like their display, and have since I started, but it has it's flaws as well. I'd have to check someone elses, but I think it isn't all that good at displaying backs. Either the scan has to be combined or it just can't or something. But I also have a few PSA cards, and if I was doing more with modernish stuff I might go with them for those. (Plus cards from probably 3-4 other grading companies. ) Steve Birmingham |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like it too. Here's my '74 #1 Laughlin Old-Time Black Stars set; 36 cards so it fills four "pages" perfectly. Enjoy!
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 in the Digital Age | sandmountainslim | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-23-2014 07:27 PM |
Digital Photo Repair | leftygrove10 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-06-2010 04:18 PM |
Scan or Digital Picture? | rdwyer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 06-21-2010 08:32 PM |
Explanation of Digital Millenium Copyright Act | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 08-31-2005 03:23 AM |
Digital Millenium Copyright Act | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 08-30-2005 02:17 PM |