 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-02-2014, 05:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Opinions on post war HoF rookie set
I am one away from finishing and am thinking about calling it complete. I need the 1949 Leaf Newhouser and I have no interest in the card. I'm also a Tiger collector and have no interest in pursuing the Leaf team set. The sad thing is I'm a fan of Prince Hal and met him at a card show about 30 years ago, he was very pleasant.
Can I consider the post war HoF rookie set complete without the Newhouser?
__________________
Tiger collector Need: E121 Veach arms folded Monster Number 520/520 
|
|
#2
05-02-2014, 06:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you need him .
Yes, if you want to
|
|
#3
05-02-2014, 07:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
My opinion, no. If the registry says it's part of the set, I think you gotta have it. If you get two, I can use one as well
|
|
#4
05-02-2014, 07:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Simple answer: Yep, you can stop here and call it complete.
Simple question: Can you go with a non-Leaf rookie card? A 1939-46 Exhibit, for example? Richard.
|
|
#6
05-02-2014, 07:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well if the registry says you have to have it - then that settles it, right?
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years."
|
|
#9
05-03-2014, 07:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gotta have it
Anyone read the book Needful Things ? A baseball card is involved
|
|
#10
05-03-2014, 09:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well the registry responses do not apply. My set is a mix of PSA and SGC.
The registries are wrong in my opinion. They continue to refer to the Leaf set as a 1948 issue. Plus why is Newhouser included when Boudreau isn't? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Tiger collector Need: E121 Veach arms folded Monster Number 520/520
|
|
#11
05-03-2014, 10:09 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
My definition of a rookie card is a national release of a player as a MLB player, so that excludes other releases. Exhibit's? I consider them postcards, others may like them, but they're not for me. I'm liking your answer of calling it complete. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Tiger collector Need: E121 Veach arms folded Monster Number 520/520
|
|
#12
05-03-2014, 10:38 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you're still not sure, don't call it anything. You can always keep it "in progress" while you pursue other things and decide later. Cheers, Richard.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2001 Walter Payton Rookie Archive Signed Cut Auto 1/1 Need Opinions | cardcollectorguru | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 2 | 10-19-2013 11:37 PM |
| New to the boards (rookie post) | GiantsDude24 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 01-28-2013 01:39 PM |
| Ozzie Smith rookie - opinions? | JasonL | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 08-06-2010 08:09 PM |
| Opinions- 1957 Topps Bob Cousy Rookie Card | ibuysportsephemera | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 5 | 08-31-2009 06:49 PM |
| I repeat! Te3rry Knouse did NOT post on "opinions on this situation, please". | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-23-2002 12:10 PM |
Linear Mode
