![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1909 T206 PIEDMONT CHRISTY MATHEWSON DARK CAP PSA 2 GOOD
Link: http://www.ebay.ca/itm/171014039191?...84.m1423.l2649 What would be a fair offer on such a card with the vision trouble on the players name? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does this type of issue affect the value a lot?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sure the flaw greatly impacts the cards value. Great looking card otherwise. Dave.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The "flaw" that earns the PSA 2 technical grade is the fading near "The Christian Gentleman's" name which in no way detracts from the overall beauty of this classic issue.
That's certainly a matter of opinion.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HRBAKER
What do you mean by that answer? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It means that I certainly think that the fading detracts considerably from the overall beauty of the card. That's just this man's opinion.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Beat me to it!
Last edited by packs; 03-29-2013 at 06:43 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks!!!
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The fading definitely detracts from the card's beauty IMO, but if this issue was on the back, it would be much more tolerable.
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with everyone else, that fading (it looks like an erasure) detracts considerably from the card's beauty and value.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
U get what u pay for. Personally I wouldn't touch it a total waste of money.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with Sean and iwantitiwinit. That is no erasure unless the term was used loosely and in general. Personally, I think everyone should own at least a dozen cards with various demerits, just for comparison and edification. But not at that price. You could do better with 'normal' wear at a lower condition.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would pay a few bucks for it because I have a small budget and that is normally an expensive card.
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agreed. I have hundreds of cards with problems~~and that Matty was a bit much for a 2 AND the loss of letters is a big distraction...
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 04-01-2013 at 10:41 PM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'd only pay 1 to 1.5 money for that Mathewson. .
__________________
. Looking for: T205 Cubs in AB, Cycle, Sov, HLC. & E91A Cubs, T206 Cubs master set, T3 Cubs |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
One for the card guys, need help understanding T206 Wagner | BrandonG | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 12 | 03-18-2012 01:17 PM |
This Looks Like Those Guys' Card Who Have the Fake T206 Wagner | Brian-Chidester | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-07-2011 06:20 PM |
What kind of Card Savers/Top Loaders do you guys use for T3's?? | bobbyw8469 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-06-2011 10:14 AM |
The Dallas get together of the vintage card guys.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 11-09-2006 08:19 AM |
Who are the Three Most Knowledgeable Vintage Baseball Card Guys | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 62 | 11-15-2005 06:23 PM |