![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Question for you guys.
I've got a couple vintage star cards and some nice jeter rookies I want to get graded never done it before. Just curious where you guys think its best to send the vintage stuff? Looking for a decent price, good resale value, and a trust worthy place Any suggestions? And should I send them all to same place or is one company better for vintage and another better for new stuff? Thanks for your help fellas |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have SGC grade my personal collection of T206 cards and PSA for more modern and post war cards. PSA may have a slight edge on re-sell value, but as many say, too each his own.
Either grading company is a fine choice and I use them both.
__________________
Hank from Cincinnati |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The vntage stuff I have is 50's and 60's
Seems like SGC is much more affordable than PSA is also |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Mike---
If you only have a few cards & are grading for your own collection & are just testing the grading waters I would use SGC. If you are grading stricly for resale I would use PSA.
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think SGC displays better.
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you are looking at resale value, go PSA. If its produced in the last ten years though, go Beckett. I would add that if you're going to hold it for a long time (personal collection) either keep it raw or go Sgc because their prices are reasonable and if you go raw and decide to sell, you can grade in the holder that at that time holds the most value, maybe a new guy will come along and become king.
__________________
N300: 11/48 T206: 175/524 E95: 24/25 E106: 4/48 E210-1: Completed December 2013 R319: 43/240 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To me it also depends on just how nice they really are. I sent my Jeter rookies to SGC on a special, and they sold for about the same as any others graded 8. Probably roughly broke even compared to raw. If they'd made 9 it would have worked out better. Sending them to SGC if you're new to it is a good idea, especially if they fit one of the specials. You'll get some idea of just how good your eye for condition is. (Although I've sent in maybe 40 cards and still get puzzled by some grades. )
Whichever company you choose if you're doing it for resale take a long second look at what you want to send in and look at prices for that card in different grades. There's always a grade where the value of grading changes. Sometimes the prices of a crard that's VG-EX is more raw since some people like to take the gamble on what it will grade. So if a card looks like it might be VG-EX but someone likes it enough to think it's EX it might not be worth grading. The Jeters are a great example,93 Upper Deck 8s are about $10 Raw are usually 6-10. Sometimes less. So grading on a $5 special is basically a losing thing unless like me you got them for very little. But 9s are about double, 10s over a hundred. So it's probably a good gamble at a maybe $1 loss. But if it's got any problem at all it's much better to sell it raw. A beckett 6.5 sold for just over $3. If you've got a good eye for grades you can do well, if not it might not be worth it. (except for the expensive stuff where even a not so good grade will do much better than a raw card that many will see as suspect -like a 52 Mantle) Steve B I do this with T206s, And I've had some really nice ones and a few failures- Ones that were either trimmed or in one case a very nice looking 3 that is a 3 because of a light crease. Still a nice looking card, just not one that would bump to vg-ex. Since I paid a VG price I figure it's ok. The upside is the couple raw cards bought for just under the usual VG-EX price that came back as 80s. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted: T206 mike powers in high grade, or nice grade with b. Hindu | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-06-2012 04:07 PM |
FSH: '62 Howard, hi-grade '54 Bowman, mid-grade '54 Topps | BIN at VCP | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-13-2010 10:32 AM |
% of Low Grade vs. High Grade Trading Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 12-09-2007 07:16 AM |
Slightly O/T - Beckett Grade of Authentic vs. Number Grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-26-2006 09:05 PM |
Low grade to mid-grade 50s Topps sets desired | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-17-2006 05:41 PM |