![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Got back from SGC today a silk that appears near-perfect--great cut, centered, no loose threads, good image, not even much of a fold. But graded A with note "missing back." I knew back was missing but did not know that automatically means an A--or does it? I thought not.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Same thing happened with me on a Chance. However the ones that had no back, are gradable numerically
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If it was a colored S74, you may have a complaint. If it was a white silk, it must have the original back to get anything more than "AUT". Can you post a scan?
__________________
Please visit my website at http://t206.monkberry.com/index.html |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is a white. I'd swear I've seen whites with no backing get a grade, but maybe not.
Well, at least I got a half point bump on a PSA card I sent at same time. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If a white one got a numerical grade without a paper back it would be a mistake...and mistakes can happen.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pretty sure if ad is on front, card is identified numerically as if there was no back
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Okay, I get it.
One other thing. I have a thing about (against) "baggies." Don't bid on or buy any card, with very rare exceptions, that is in any kind of covering (except the slab plastic). I hate the Silks in bags so I asked SGC to do mine without it and they agreed. Yes, it only got an "A" but it looks fantastic--shiny even--in the slab without the baggy. Also I just switched a very nice NM card of another type out of a PSA holder only for that "baggy" reason and happily got a 7.5 from SGC but that's just a bonus because it looks 100% without the bag. I guess we all have our hangups. Don't get me started on centering. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question re: S21 vs. S22 tobacco silks | BradH | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-09-2011 09:47 AM |
Question about buying graded | mjmj1966 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 09-07-2011 11:18 PM |
fs/th S74 silks chance and Parent SGC graded | Republicaninmass | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 04-02-2011 06:22 PM |
Graded Review Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-09-2009 09:23 AM |
Question about Graded cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-26-2001 11:07 AM |