ok fess up

[Leon]

I just wasted approx. 15 minutes reading an old thread for no freaking apparent reason except it was interesting. It had to do with privacy on the board, which isn't even a current topic (nor do I want to make it one). But how many folks have wasted a good bit of time reading old threads that pertain to nothing currently? I get distracted way too easily

[scooter729]

Can I count this first post as a waste of 30 seconds? (smiles inserted in case sarcasm meter isn't on)

[Leon]

Originally Posted by scooter729

Can I count this first post as a waste of 30 seconds? (smiles inserted in case sarcasm meter isn't on)

maybe 20 seconds.....

[bn2cardz]

I have done it a lot... usually it starts with a search word that takes me to post that ends up being not what I was looking for but leads to me getting caught up in the drama of some argument that I can't seem to stop reading. (Usually turns out it was an autograph thread )

[sportscardpete]

I typed in Marshall and bring the noise, and had about an hours worth of entertaintment. Some of the old threads are just as good as the newer threads

[DerekMichael]

i really dig all of the info you guys have posted about the t206 set over the years, so i am for sure a "back tracker"

[atx840]

Most of my time is spent reading old threads....too bad all those scans/pics/ebay links still didn't work. Some are useless but most are very informative.

[batsballsbases]

Originally Posted by sportscardpete

i typed in marshall and bring the noise, and had about an hours worth of entertaintment. Some of the old threads are just as good as the newer threads

barry goat:d:d

[Republicaninmass]

That "Archive" guy sure id post a lot way back when...wonder where THEY are now

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass

That "Archive" guy sure id post a lot way back when...wonder where THEY are now

Probably facing a lawsuit or something .