![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have noticed that the Benny Bengough card out of the 33 Goudey set goes for the same prices as a lot of Hall Of Famers in the set. What is the big craze over this common player? Why is this card worth a little extra?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
First card of this popular set. Difficult to find in good condition.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doesn't it have to do with the card being #1 and the rubber band around the stack thing. Not to say that shouldn't affect every #1 card on card sets in the 30s - 50s.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
First card of a popular set always demands a premium. Look at the 1952 Topps card (Andy Pafko). Even on popular non-sports sets, the first and last cards always get the bump......
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is no justification for a high price and lower and mid-grade levels. It is tough to find at the higher condition levels.
JimB |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A midgrade bengough 5-6 is not that easy to get. I feel it too should have some premium. lower grades however especially very low grade should have very little to no premium over a common, yet it still does as do most #1 cards.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sold | mackmen | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-01-2010 02:15 PM |
1933 Goudey sheet cut cards | jb217676 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-17-2010 07:01 AM |
More 1933 Goudey Ungraded | jabiloxi | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 11-21-2009 08:13 PM |
1933 U.S. Caramel Scarcity VS 1933 Goudey etc | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-20-2009 08:32 PM |
1933 benny bengough question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-30-2008 12:27 PM |