 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-29-2012, 11:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Grading help
I feel that NET54 is the premier place to come with questions about the hobby. With that in mind, can anyone direct me to a resource that gives a comprehensive grading criteria? It seems the hobby has matured and there is no longer a one-size-fits-all system that was in place 20 yrs ago when I stopped being a "dealer".
For instance, a trimmed, marked, or creased card was once "worthless". That doesn't seem to be the case now. Also, different issues seem to have different criteria. I wonder if there is any generally accepted criteria in place and if there is somewhere where I can brush up. Using my "Old" grading technique, this '35 Diamond Star I would rate as a NM to NMMT without the trimmed corners and traced name. With these flaws, I'd give it a Poor. How would you grade this? Thanks!
__________________
"If you ever discover the sneakers for far more shoes in your everyday individual, and also have a wool, will not disregard the going connected with sneakers by Isabel Marant a person." =AcellaGet 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Consistent grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-25-2008 05:09 PM |
| Grading Compnay Questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-11-2008 03:51 PM |
| One of the things that's wrong with the current grading system | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-28-2007 08:04 AM |
| What is it, exactly, about grading? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-27-2006 08:42 AM |
| Starting a Grading Company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-22-2004 10:57 AM |
Threaded Mode