Need some opinions on a Roger Clemens auto

[Woundedduck]

On the scan of the back, the sticker at the top is on the holder. The small silver sticker is on the card. What do you think? authentic or not? Plugging in the number on the back of the card into tristars website takes me here:

http://www.tristarauthentic.com/Auth...thentic+Record

Thanks for any help.

Eric

[Scott Garner]

Likely real. FWIW, this signature looks very similar to others that I personally got of Clemens in the past.

I hope this helps!

[kneerat]

It definitely has a shot...

[Woundedduck]

submitted it to PSA without the holder, but with the sticker still on the back and they rejected it. I'm trying to decide if I should carefully peel the sticker and resubmit it.

[baseball tourist]

With room (larger surface on which to sign) Roger's sig is usually quite nice. This is cramped but the looping "R" and "C" looks right when compared to the Rocket's I have had.

[Scott Garner]

Originally Posted by Woundedduck

submitted it to PSA without the holder, but with the sticker still on the back and they rejected it. I'm trying to decide if I should carefully peel the sticker and resubmit it.

Triststar has had Clemens as a signer several times in the past. It has a Tristar sticker. Why go through all of the PSA BS over a signed Roger Clemens card. It seems like overkill, eh?

[gnaz01]

The sig is fine.

[Woundedduck]

Originally Posted by Scott Garner

Triststar has had Clemens as a signer several times in the past. It has a Tristar sticker. Why go through all of the PSA BS over a signed Roger Clemens card. It seems like overkill, eh?

Probably true, but I was submitting a few other things at the time so I threw it in. I thought it would be nice to have it encapsulated. That and other people tend to respect PSAs authentication more than others. It is a PC item that I'm not plannning on moving so it really doesn't matter much, but you never know, that could change. If I had to sell it, it would do better if authenticated and encapsulated by PSA.