![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just got the wonderful call from Scott at PSA telling me my E98 Green Ed Walsh was defaced and basically is impossible to identify now that they tried to slab it. They have definitely lost a customer. I mean it wasn't that great looking in the first place, had some paint chipping, but all I wanted was a PSA 1 or A to protect it. To destroy it is just dumb.
If anyone has one please let me know! I have a blue and red and was going for all 4 colors...green is out of the mix and I need another!
__________________
Boston College Class of 2014 Carroll School of Management |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm not sure I understand? I guess I didn't realize a card can be defaced during the grading process by any grading company???? How can it happen, anyone ever seen how they vacuum seal them in the container?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Trust me thats what he said. At first it just had some paint chipping now he told me when the machine did the thing it got defaced and is impossible to identify if you didn't know what it was before.
__________________
Boston College Class of 2014 Carroll School of Management |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just curious if they compensate you in any way or is/was it at your own risk.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That definitely sucks Seth.
Since PSA destroyed the card, they should at least reimburse you for what you had purchased the card for, but they'll probably want to give you vouchers for future submissions instead.
__________________
Current projects: White Sox prewar type set White Sox T206 Master set 1952 Topps set |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sorry to hear it. I had a 1915 CJ Bender and they apparently thought 'bend' was an instruction and not part of the name.
I had a scan of the card just before sending to PSA and was able to show them the 'before' scan, but after some back and forth, I ended up getting my next $200 order comped. I would rather have had the card without the crease, but I took the free subs since I know no one is perfect and the occasional issue could happen with anyone. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Had a 1970 Reggie Jackson in NMt-Mt submitted to them raw, and it came back a five, as I recall years ago, due to a bent corner. Unfortunately, it didn't have the bent corner when I submitted it. The only time I've submitted cards since was when they were grading on-site at various Nationals.
Larry |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
alot of the other problems in the thread can be attributed to psa's mishandling...but i won't put the blame on the 100% for the e98. these are very prone to flaking on the surface, especially if they're beginning to flake already (if i remember the e98 green walsh correctly).
i've had a couple e98s where when i take the raw card out of the sleeve i can see some specks or flecks being left behind in the sleeve. who knows maybe they were soaked or treated before and this is the aftermath. e94s same thing. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had this happen to me with a 1977 Sportscaster card. Those are thin cards and the card was going to grade a 9 (according to PSA). It got ruined in the encapsulation process and PSA gave me enough free grades to more than make it worth while.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This happens sometimes particularly with E98's and a couple of other caramel issues prone to chipping. If they are willing to make good I dont see it as a problem. Stuff happens.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At a show, I was shown my Mays card that had been scraped on the front when they were holdering it. They mailed me a check for the card.
I gave SGC a card that had been misidentified. They corrected the problem by putting the card into the correct labeled holder. The correctly identified card was of a lesser value than the misidentified card would have been. I was given a smile for the difference in value. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Not sure what the issue was on this deal. Damaged card- you are owed. Mis-labeled card- worth more by defrauding only. SGC doesn't owe anything and you could have left it in the slab right??? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I submitted a fragile card to PSA a few years ago at the national and after Their reps warned me of how rough encapsulation could be on that particular card, I decided to slab it anyway. It worked out fine but I guess I'm curious, is the SGC slabbing process as potentially harsh on a fragile card as PSA's? I've got a couple more super beaters I'd like to slab.
Danny
__________________
e105 Mello Mint Set Want List (45/50): 1) Chase 2) Cobb 3) Crawford 4) Magee 5) O'Hara N172 Want List (all poses and variations) 1) Phenomenal Smith 2) Chicken Wolf 3) Frank Genins / Genius 4) STL Browns Champions Portraits |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F/S T206-220 cards,Cobb & all 48 SL'ers | Julian Wells | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 08-17-2010 02:55 PM |
1971 PSA HOF, 68-79 PSA and some raw | Zact | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 09-05-2009 06:59 AM |
VINTAGE Football Boxing Hockey Liquidation | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 11 | 05-19-2009 09:11 PM |
new 1952 topps wantlist with buy prices | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-18-2007 06:06 AM |
PSA GRADED 1,2, & 3's 60 T206's NEW SALE PRICES | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 09-27-2006 04:16 PM |