![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...K%3AMEWAX%3AIT
Just hit the BIN on this. It will be my first T3. Yes it's in rough shape, but I'm very excited about it. I'm a little worried about authenticity, but I checked with a reputable source ![]() ![]()
__________________
Cards Wanted: -I like HoF beaters ![]() 1928 Shonen Kulubu Ruth and/or 1929 Churchman's Ruth T206 Cy Young - glove shows http://s241.photobucket.com/home/woundedduck/allalbums Last edited by Woundedduck; 11-29-2010 at 11:58 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice pick-up!
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice pick up for sure, especially with the attractive ad back
Too bad it pictures Jack Barry instead of Frank Baker |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't know about that one. Looks funny to me. Borders seem too light but the image area has deep colors. Seller doesn't have any cards for sale older than the '50's. Just doesn't ring right with me.
__________________
I Remember Now. ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
haha I didn't know that. So is it considered a Barry card with the name error or a Baker card with a picture error? The graded examples still label it as Baker. I may have to look up some vintage photos of the two players
__________________
Cards Wanted: -I like HoF beaters ![]() 1928 Shonen Kulubu Ruth and/or 1929 Churchman's Ruth T206 Cy Young - glove shows http://s241.photobucket.com/home/woundedduck/allalbums |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like a good deal to me. I think you did fine. Hall of Famer and tougher ad back.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There are only 1 kind of Good T3 reprints, the Mike Wheat ones from a few years back. They are full size reprints and If I remember right the back all have the checklist back and the only real difference in design was that he added clef designs in the corners of the back (they can be scuffed off though)
All of the other reprints are modern card size 2.5" by 3.5" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd say card is legit, nice pick up! Strange wear on top is consistent with others I have seen. Just have to look closely and see if it was pencil or other marks that have been erased or altered. You cant go wrong with a nice Hof'er
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all the comments! I was thinking I'd eventually pay that price for a worn T3 non-HoFer so to come across this was pretty exciting for me. Maybe I overpaid a little for the condition, but I'm very happy. I was a bit worried about authenticity so it's nice to hear so many say they believe it's authentic. I pmed Leon about it and got his opinion on authenticity just after I'd hit the BIN. I always feel bad bugging people doing that, but I really appreciate all the knowledgeable collectors on this site. It's really made my leap into vintage a fun and successful start. If there was an easy way to do it, I'd sell 99% of my modern stuff and spend more on vintage. That's just about all I buy now anyway
![]()
__________________
Cards Wanted: -I like HoF beaters ![]() 1928 Shonen Kulubu Ruth and/or 1929 Churchman's Ruth T206 Cy Young - glove shows http://s241.photobucket.com/home/woundedduck/allalbums |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Authentic cards have a "orange peel" like texture to the surface.... the surface wear on this card shows this quite well.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Woundedduck,
Please always feel free to PM me or email me if I can help with anything. That goes for anyone else too. I am always more than glad to help. And it's always better to be safe than sorry. If I don't know something I will readily say I don't know. (actually I know everything but need to put that last line in so I don't sound conceited ![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I wish they would have added "Reprint" on them as well. ![]() |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
nice Jay-don't know much about T3s-thanks for educating me.
__________________
T206Resource.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() Got it in this week here's the scan ![]()
__________________
Cards Wanted: -I like HoF beaters ![]() 1928 Shonen Kulubu Ruth and/or 1929 Churchman's Ruth T206 Cy Young - glove shows http://s241.photobucket.com/home/woundedduck/allalbums |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like a little fading along the top border, otherwise a nice T3 and the real mccoy!
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Real, but it looks like someone may have used some water and/or an eraser to clean the front up a bit. It could be honest wear I guess but it is kinda strange looking.
-Rhett
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah it's a bit worn but it brought the price down on a HoF T3 into my price range so I'm very happy! Still a gorgeous card in my opinion.
![]()
__________________
Cards Wanted: -I like HoF beaters ![]() 1928 Shonen Kulubu Ruth and/or 1929 Churchman's Ruth T206 Cy Young - glove shows http://s241.photobucket.com/home/woundedduck/allalbums |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this a reprint - looks too good to be true.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 06-05-2006 02:16 PM |
How about some GOOD stories re the grading companies? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-05-2006 05:23 PM |
Attention Tobacco Card Collectors Too Good To Be True | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-30-2006 10:03 AM |
Passing of a true legend. RIP Curt | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-20-2006 07:29 PM |
Too good to be true? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 01-16-2006 02:52 PM |