![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which would you prefer? | |||
A card that is NRMT-MT with 85/15- L/R centering over an EXMT card that is 50/50- L/R |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 11.32% |
A card that is EXMT with 50/50- L/R centering over a NRMT-MT card that is 85/15- L/R |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
74 | 69.81% |
It doesn't matter to me, I look at other characteristics |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
20 | 18.87% |
Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Coming off of the heels of the '52 Mantle thread I think it would be a good topic to see where folks stand on "centering" of our beloved cardboard. For this thread lets assume that both cards hold equal value and all other characteristics are the same. Personally, I like better centered cards but it will be interesting to see the sentiments of our members. And for all of those that are averse to plastic just play like these are raw....IT's the cards we are talking about!! best regards
ps...Have I mentioned lately how much I love this board software we use? ![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You beat me to it, I was going to post a poll after my comment about the Mantle. I'm guessing I'm in the minority (as usual), but I really don't care about centering. As long as the card has all of the borders that it's supposed to, it doesn't matter to me if it's 50/50 or 99/1.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a feeling that would be about the only chance of it staying that way.
![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I always look for a card with really nice centering.
I would prefer a lower grade card with perfect centering, over a higher grade card with poor centering any day. Just my opinion. Tony |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Centering is nice, but on older cards the overall preservation of the edges and corners seems a bit harder to find. So I'm not very picky about centering.
Even on newer stuff I'll sometimes go for a miscut card over one with average centering. Steve B |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like the poll but it is a difficult question for me to answer. A lot depends on the issue, how tough it is to fine a well-centered example within that set, whether I am trying to complete the set at a consistent grade (physical characteristics like centering, crease free, gloss, etc.), etc. So for me, academic that I am, the question is complicated.
JimB |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What JimB said.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Centering is important to me also as I prefer PSA's stricter grading on centering (w/ NQ) than SGC's.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Centering is important to me as well so I voted for the 50/50 option. However, IMO, centering should play no part in the numerical grade of a card. The grade of a card should be determined solely on the condition where the card is evaluated/graded based on it's own environment – good or bad – not the lack of quality control from the factory. PSA don't even follow their own standards. Taken directly from their website, "the experts are asked to grade the condition of the card on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being best." Centering is not a condition. PSA's O/C qualifier is a joke! Anybody that needs to see an O/C qualifier to tell them that the card is off center probably shouldn't be in this hobby.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Being tied almost exclusively to the Old Judge issue these days, centering means almost nothing to me. If I can find a card that is on my want list and has a nice picture, I am not going to be concerned about centering at all.
Even when I was collecting other pre-war and post-war issues, poor centering did not detract from the aesthetics of the card for me as much as bad edges, bad corners and a bad image did. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find myself leaning more toward better centered card than higher grade ones recently. although I am working on a 1962 mars attacks which is really tough to find centered
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors Last edited by Republicaninmass; 10-06-2010 at 01:56 PM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would prefer the lesser grade, better centered card and, like one of the prior comments, attach more significance to L/R centering than top-bottom.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"Would you prefer a card that is NRMT-MT with 85/15- L/R centering, or an EXMT card that is 50/50- L/R?"
Hmmm... which one's cheaper?
__________________
-- the three idiots at Baseball Games https://baseballgames.dreamhosters.com/ https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/baseballgames/ Successful transactions with: bocabirdman, GrayGhost, jimivintage, Oneofthree67, orioles93, quinnsryche, thecatspajamas, ValKehl |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what JimB and Jeff said.
best, barry |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Poll: Preferences to displaying your cards | WhenItWasAHobby | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 07-29-2010 12:34 PM |
New Poll at top- Defects..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-01-2007 07:13 PM |
Pick the new Poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 12-19-2006 04:32 PM |
New Poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 10-09-2005 07:30 AM |
The Poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-28-2002 01:14 AM |