![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
About a month ago I purchased a collection of cards from a family friend. I had been planning on buying the for awhile, just waiting for the guy to finally decide to sell them. I was hoping he would have waited a couple more years, but I bit the bullet and bought them. I posted a question on this site shortly after buying them. I have finally been able to get through them and record what I have. A couple of the years are a little rough, a few probably in the good range and a few in the very good+ range, with some cards being nrmt.
I wanted to posted the number of cards in each year and some of my plans for them. Topps 1952 47/407 1953 174/274 1954 233/250 1955 190/206 1956 292/340 1957 119/407 1958 108/494 1959 50/572 1964 5/587 1965 18/598 1966 9/598 1967 29/609 1968 25/598 1969 40/664 1970 66/720 1971 274/752 1972 46/787 Bowman 1953 B/W 35/64 1953 Color 124/274 1954 222/224 1955 267/320 There were also some jumbo Donruss cards 83-87 (i think) and then some Exhibit cards. I am looking at trying to complete a few of these sets that I have a pretty good start on. 1954 Bowman, 1954 Topps, 1955 Topps. After I complete those I don't know which set I will try to compete. (Probably will wait until these cards are paid off before another one after these three, as I have most of the key cards in these sets so I mostly need commons) I have a few doubles that I am going to take to a show next week and maybe try to trade them for some of the cards I need. Other than those I am not looking to sell or trade any of the other cards. Any tips on trying to complete sets or on any of these individual sets? Thanks. Last edited by scottpt99; 01-15-2011 at 10:21 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
unless you have an unlimited budget, I would very carefully select "must have" COMPLETE sets. Just because you have a large lot of a set doesn't mean you have to finish it (I have made this mistake). Buying Short-Prints/High's and all the commons even can get very tedious and expensive so I would pick one or two sets you REALLY like and try to get them done first...If I had to do it all over again I would pick one or two sets from each decade and build a very nice grade set of each and then just pick up a few key players/rc's from the other sets and call it a day...JMO
Also, I'm sure you know this but make sure you check this collection for high numbers as some of them are easy $100 bills (ex: 52 high's 311 and above..) Last edited by mintacular; 09-07-2010 at 11:06 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the info...I will keep this in mind. The first three sets I am going to work are mostly just commons that I need. (other than the 54 Bowman, in which I need the Ted Williams, but sounds like most conisder it complete without that one.) Most of the other sets will be a few years down the road other than a few commons here and there.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Websites: Positive or negative influence on acquiring new items for your collection? | Vintagecatcher | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-20-2010 05:23 PM |
Building Your Collection | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-09-2007 01:07 PM |
The Benjamin Edwards Collection in The Library of Congress | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 08-27-2007 02:53 PM |
E90-1 (Nagy Collection) - - FOR SALE | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 08-07-2006 07:13 PM |
MR X collection...Over rated? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-10-2005 06:32 PM |