![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Rooting for Mosley, expecting Mayweather to win by decision.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
agreed. Mosley always has a chance, fights his heart out.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Think it will be a good fight. I'm taking Mayweather. I am not positive that he can KO Mosely though.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm going with Mosley by KO.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Same here. I hate to say it and I hope I'm wrong but Mayweather may potentially embarrass Shane in there. I heard somebody make a good point the other day. Shane has quick hands............but slow feet. In other words Shane has always had a tough time cutting off the ring against a technically skilled boxer. He had problems with De La Hoya in the 2nd fight, he had problems against Vernon Forrest and he had huge problems against Winky Wright. Mayweather isn't as big as any of these guys but he is most definitely faster and is good at fighting in the pocket when he needs to. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boxing - Vintage Photos - Sugar Ray Robinson & Others ending Tonight Dec. 6th on Ebay | D. Bergin | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 12-06-2009 08:36 AM |
Money for T206 Honus Wagner of Cobb/Edwards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 12-07-2008 07:35 PM |
Americans' 10 Biggest Wastes of Money | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 09-28-2006 06:47 PM |
Buy It Now (I Would If I Had The Money Or Needed The Card) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-16-2005 02:53 PM |
PAPER MONEY AS WELL!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 09-01-2002 03:19 PM |