![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which is a bigger influence on the items you collect? Conditional rarity, or absolute rarity? Does a high grade common player/common back T206 turn your crank as much as a poor grade BL460 backed card? I prefer absolute rarity. Whats your preference?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As someone just getting into the game of rarity, overall rarity is foremost for me. It is also difficult for me to afford "pristine" anything, so rarity has to take presidence over condition. Just my 2 cents on the subject!
Last edited by Browncow75; 04-18-2010 at 09:03 PM. Reason: spelling error |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Absolute rarity.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Perfect subject for a poll. Absolute rarity.
__________________
The other white JP.... |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Some things are RARE b/c they are the only ones in a high grade, put that in your pipe and SMOKE it!
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, that would be one of the two choices -- conditional rarity. Me thinks you didn't read the thread starter...
__________________
The other white JP.... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Which happens to be the very definition of "conditional rarity". ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
And more are being made each day. That is the problem. And those not only don't smoke well they are also worth a fraction of what people think they are.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess I'm somewhere in the middle-I like mid-grade common's & HOF'ers with semi-scarce backs........
Clayton |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
rarity , does not influence my collecting choices. I collect what I like and what interests me, not what I think will make me the most money later if I sell it.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For me, neither, really. Rarity (or more appropriately scarcity) affect how I collect, more than what I collect. What I collect is and has been for a while fairly narrowly defined, surprisingly. T207 and pre-war Pirates.
Knowing which ones are mostly likely not to be seen again - in any condition - drives purchasing priority. After that, relative rarity within the set of collecting interest is the deciding factor. This can be either conditional or absolute. T207's in SGC 70 or above aren't that plentiful, but seem to be showing up a little more often lately... yes, they're out there, but tucked away in collections, but I'd take either of the "Red"'s in (almost) any grade over any common... and similar to what Ron said above - I'm not a big fan of really ugly cards. I own them purely out of necessity (as if we ever really need cards)... -- Mike |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would rather have a PSA 1 T206 Demmit or O'hara than something like a T206 Cobb in a higher grade. Conditional rarity doesn't really mean much to me.
Rick
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't think high grade common cards are rare because if you need an example of the card to complete a set you can easily get one. I think a card is rare if it is very difficult to find one to acquire in any condition. I prefer to have common cards in common conditions. What interests me most are cards that are very, very hard to find in any condition. Cards that have only a handful (or even one) specimen are the tops for me. I'll take this over a mint common Exhibit any day of the week:
![]() ![]()
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 04-20-2010 at 08:55 AM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Prefer the rarer card, irrespective of condition.
Frank |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will take a rare low grade card over a high grade common every day of the week.
James G
__________________
WTB Boston Store Cards esp Ruth, Hornsby and 1915/16 UNC Strip cards and other Boston Store's too. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rarity | Bicem | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 111 | 07-24-2009 12:17 PM |
Relative Rarity of T205 Matty with Diff. Ad Brands | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 11-19-2008 04:52 AM |
Perceived or Real? rarity of 1967 B Robby, 1970 Bench | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 32 | 10-11-2007 08:23 AM |
Rarity argument at work today | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 08-25-2006 12:27 PM |
Why isn't Rarity the No.1 factor in determining a card's value? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 07-06-2006 06:59 PM |