![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Phil Garry
With the recent conversation about how board members feel about newspaper supplements such as M101-1's, what are your thoughts on the series of 40+ Harper's Weekly woodcuts that are catalogued in Lew Lipset's 3-volume Baseball Card Encyclopedia? Are these undervalued collectibles that will gain more appreciation in the future as many pre-date the traditional rookies issued by Old Judge, etc.? How do they compare to supplements/premiums such as M101-1's? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1859 Harper's Woodcuts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-09-2007 12:37 PM |
Harper's Woodcuts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-11-2005 06:07 PM |
Harpers Weekly Woodcuts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-22-2003 02:32 PM |
Harper's Weekly- Baseball? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-24-2003 10:02 AM |
Question about Harper's Woodcuts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 11-23-2002 07:43 AM |