![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am need of a metaphor to understand the volume of prewar cards compared to post-war. Could someone break this down in simple terms? Obviously, there is some variation depending on how far back or how fast forward you go, but I am just interested in a "ballpark" estimate of each. Perhaps by the end of the thread it will be necessary to break it down more specifically per decade in each said era....So, for example, a simple "run of the mill" common T206 might sell for $20 and its equivalent 1950s common, $2. Therefore, the pre-war stuff is (generally) x10 more scarce?
Last edited by mintacular; 11-02-2009 at 07:51 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scarcity, Real, Artificial, and Imagined | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 09-23-2007 05:27 PM |
the issue of scarcity re:206 backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 11-25-2006 09:31 PM |
Scarcity vs. Condition | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 07-10-2006 04:38 PM |
T205 Breakdown for back scarcity 2004-05 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-13-2005 05:33 PM |
assessing vintage card scarcity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 07-04-2004 01:24 PM |