![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: rand
so in a nut shell, last year JSA got duped by a fake autograph at a show, now PSA is on the hook with the fake T206.... what does it mean to YOU as a collector or submitter? is anything going to change? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Al C.risafulli
No. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Doug
It definitely concerns me that this many errors are getting out there. If they are missing this bad on these high profile/high dollar cards you can only imagine how many lower end cards are slipping through. All I can say is to make sure you know what you are buying to the point where you are comfortable trusting your own eye and judgment before making a purchase. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: marshall barkman
No one is really that concerned about lower end cards Doug because outside of set building they have no impact on the hobby. In regards to a Sal Bando autograph i'm sure Spence did not authenticate it and it was one of his employees. James is the best in the business and i mean who would authenticate a Sal Bando auto? Sal Bando? Was he like a mafia hitman or ballplayer? Just kidding of course. LOL |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
In business, it's not whether or not you make mistakes, it's how you recover from them that counts. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
THIS IS WHAT TROUBLES ME ABOUT THIS GRADING SUBJECTIVITY THING!!THE QUESTION THAT SHOULD BE ASKED IS WHO SENT THE HIGH VALUE T206 CARD IN? IF WE KNOW THAT ANSWER, THEN WE KNOW WHY A TRIMMED (OR WHAT EVER WAS WRONG WITH IT) CARD GOT THROUGH THEIR SYSTEM. NOW THE REASON I'M SAYING THIS IS BECAUSE I HAVE A NICE FOLDER OF CARDS I PERSONALLY BOUGHT FROM THE "BIG DEALERS". NOW IF I SENT THOSE SAME CARDS IN,I KNOW BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT WHAT MY GRADES WOULD BE. I'M IN THE PROCESS OF WORKING WITH A LOCAL NEWS STATION ON THIS VERY THING. I'M NOT KNOCKING PSA, BUT I FEEL AS A HOBBYIST AND A LOYAL CUSTOMER, MY QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ANSWERED. IF YOU WANT TO SEE THE SCANS BEFORE THE STORY AIRS, LET ME KNOW. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: keyway
I find autograph authentication to be an absolute joke. In one of the major auctions last year there were many Ruth auto's. They were so different that there was no way the same person signed them. All were deemed good by the same "so called" expert in auto's. I have watched some of these so called experts in action at shows. Seems the people they know get anything they want passed, while strangers to them always seem to have bad auto's. The major thing is it is only their oppinion, yet they are treated as though they are true experts and have some way to communicate with the dead to see if the item was signed by them. To me they are the lowest of the low in the hobby. Frank |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Doug
"No one is really that concerned about lower end cards Doug because outside of set building they have no impact on the hobby." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
If you define low end as <$500 per card I believe that a relatively small % of collectors regularly buy "high end" cards. The vast majority of collectors, like the vast majority of people generally, don't have $500 in discretionary money available for single cards. Those of us that do should be happy we do. Regardless of how much a collector spends, to that collector his or her acquisitions are precious, and it is just wrong to denigrate the "low end" collectors on sheer economics. I know a lot of "low end" collectors who are passionate about the hobby and their collections and know far more about cards than some of the "high end" collectors. As far as economic impact, ask any dealer here and they will confirm that sales under $500 a card make up a large proportion of their businesses. <br> |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Mt. Joy
Well there are plenty of pros and cons with grading. For me I can say that I am back collecting because of it, because of grading my confort level buying cards online is totaly different. I no long feel like I am at the mercy of the dealers. I could not imagine buying $1000+ cards online without it. I will say that as I have gotten back and gotten to know certain issue I am now buy lots raw but I still slam them. Hey its how I like to collect. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Doug
I didn't mean low end to be a derogatory term. If these 5-6 figure cards that are probably a slim minority of the submissions slip by there has to be a ton of the $500 or less cards (the standard PSA service level cutoff which was where I got the figure) that are getting holdered. Sorry if that came off the wrong way, I was just referring to the low and high ends of the PSA submission services not the value/quality of the cards. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: rand
yes, we all make mistakes. yes, i rarely buy ungraded cards. what i want to know from my fellows 54 contributors is why PSA allowed to get away with this mistake. who will ask for their money back, who is responsible, who could take them to court and sue for the purchase price, and lastly who will be the witness to prove it is Fake? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
Can someone post a link to the Nodgrass thread that Wonka wrote here? For Rand, I don't think he has seen it yet. Dan. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Scott, |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Robert Dixon
I am new to the hobby. A couple of months ago I bought a couple of cards (off of this board) that were ungraded. Up to this point I was apprehensive about buying ungraded cards. The seller listed them to be in VG condition. I sent them in to SGC to get them graded, and they both came back as ungradeable because of "Color Added". I don't know how to get around that. I am not experienced enough to look at a scan and tell if a card is a reprint or altered. So I decided then that I wouldn't but any more ungraded cards. The way I see it, a card may slip by them from time to time, but not nearly as often as they will slip by me. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Robert, |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I better get this in before I lock it, right Al? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
The issue with that Leon is that most collectors do not have the ability or more importantly the desire to invest the time necessary to figure out if a card is legit. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Al C.risafulli
Leon, I wrote that only because I figured you were going to lock up that thread quick, because you locked the other one. Kudos for letting it go a while. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
One thing that is apparent from doing business with both is that the grading arts at PSA and SGC are different in certain respects, primarily having to do with the primacy of centering versus sharpness and corners. IMO PSA emphasizes centering more than SGC and SGC emphasizes sharpness and corners more than PSA. Overall I happen to prefer SGC's approach to grading so the vast majority of my business will go there but I understand PSA's as well. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Lefty GROVE, George SISLER + Lyons Auto's JSA +PSA | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 01-17-2009 12:48 PM |
FS: Ty Cobb Auto JSA + George Sisler 1916 Rookie PSA | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 10-17-2008 01:48 PM |
PSA/DNA Is Being Challenged by BGS/JSA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 11-25-2007 05:22 PM |
Best day/time to end Ebay auction? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-15-2007 01:07 PM |
T206 PSA 8 & PSA 7 on eBay end SUN 1/28 | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 01-27-2007 04:14 PM |