![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
PSA 4 MK your point? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob
I think Brian's point is that you depend on grading companies to be consistent and grade cards in a reasonable and correct manner. If you bought this card sight unseen relying on "PSA 4 (MK)" I am sure you would have cardiac arrest. This should have been "authentic" or PSA 1 at best. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
not all qualifiers are created equal. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rob D.
The good news: That's Red Ruffing's scribble on the front of the card. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Murray
has to be kidding!!! That's a 2(MK) on a good day. SGC 10 all day. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: bigfish
That is a perfect grade given by the expects at PSA!!! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
the super high brightness on the front doesn't jive well with the white borders, but judging by the back scan the corners are at least VG with the rounding if the card doesn't have any creases. the writing is terribad and distracting...too bad. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Steve, |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
I question this grade as well, but anybody that would buy a card with an MK qualifier sight unseen is an idiot. Anyway, anybody who buys that one off ebay clearly sees what the MK refers to. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob
Jim- I agree completely, the point I was making was that IF someone had purchased a PSA 4 MK card sight unseen (and I agree I wouldn't buy a MK qualifier without knowing exactly why it had the MK qualifier), he would not reasonable assume that he was getting something with this distracting and degrading of a "mark." Usually you see a small pen notation on the back of a card giving it a PSA MK qualifier. To me, it should be graded "authentic" as this is much more disturbing aestheticaly than a beautiful front with major paper loss on the back which gets an automatic "authentic" grade. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I agree with Bob. That's an "Auth" at best. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
It's just PSA's grading scale - MK means a mark no matter what the size and an Authentic grade has nothing to do with the aesthetics. Usually, the marks are smaller, but that doesn't mean that is how PSA defines an MK qualifier. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
I guess I agree with Bob and Barry too. That is pretty bad. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: sagard
Actually in this case PSA describes the card perfectly. The card without the marking is likely vg/ex right? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
- August 12, 2008 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
well done quan |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim VB
Excellent Quan. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
Actually in this case PSA describes the card perfectly. The card without the marking is likely vg/ex right? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1953 Howell RC PSA 7 1961 DeJordy RC PSA 7 1965 Cheevers RC PSA 7.5 For Sale | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 01-15-2009 10:30 AM |
FS-T207's Mullin No D PSA 6 (highest graded),McDonald PSA 6 (1 higher), Henry PSA 3 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-03-2007 05:30 AM |