![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
That's a very busy card. Love it! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joseph Shirley
That is one of the coolest T206 overprint errors I have seen. Let us know if/when you send it to auction. I do not collect error cards at this time, but would love to follow this one. I suspect some big bucks for it. Makes you wonder what happenned to the rest of the sheet? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T E
My guess is rest of the sheet was scattered across northeast. The original collection was mostly sweet cap and piedmont backs. One thing to note is the miscut on the card's left border. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Marty Ogelvie
That card has to be one of the most fascinating T206s I have seen. I simply love it. martyOgelvie nyyankeecards.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Adam
Amazing card, congrats on getting it encapsulated! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anthony S.
Well, it is a Southern Leaguer, but it does have a crease, and I see it only got an authentic grade. I'll give you $45 for it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Craig W
Very kewl to have a near complete back collection with one card! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
Certainly a 1/1. They should have slabbed it with Cy facing front. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
I love seeing those errors. Thanks for sharing it! |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: AndyH
This is fascinating. I just finished a post on my blog about an hour ago talking about the T206 Chance printer's scrap that closed on eBay a couple days ago and I pictured this exact card in my post. I showed a couple of amazing backs and remembered yours. Then I searched the archives and found the original thread and borrowed the image to include in my blog. Now, here you are, posting a follow up thread about the card. Simply awesome. I love this card. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
Great card! it is a crying shame that it is encapsulated! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
2nd verse, same as the 1st |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rob D.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T E
Great card to share like this. When my apartment was robbed way back when, I took consolation that the crooks didn't get this card. I looked at it many times, wondering who the portrait was (I was a big bb fan but not really t206 collector, once I figured out that the ghost was not Wagner I figured it pretty much worthless but VERY cool, which is really what collectables is all about). |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Adam
This is a neat card, no doubt, but $45,000????? Really???? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MVSNYC
i usually don't comment on such matters or get involved in any drama... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jon Canfield
Can someone provide the link. Thanks in advance! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhett Yeakley
here is the link: |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Trae R.
The price is obviously far-fetched, but what really strikes me as odd is that the Cy Young ghost image is the main selling point made in the auction. I am more interested in the fact that it also has a Brown Old Mill overprint. I would be willing to bet there are more print freaks than Brown Old Mills out there. A combination of both is simply amazing. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
Guys - might I suggest we don't call out a fellow board member publicly for a high listing price. Consider if there was a board reader who was considering the card at that price and now certainly won't. A little "Do onto others..." |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MVSNYC
Matt- like i said, i usually never get involved in any drama on this board, and i truly wish the seller luck (we have had a few pleasant email correspondence in the past)...but, as a T206 collector of 20 years, i had to agree with Adam's "call-out"...if it was listed at $10,000 (which is still above its value, IMO), no one would have said anything...but it was listed at $45,000...and it got properly called-out. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Your point regarding the BROWN Old Mill (So. Lge. back) is well taken. I don't think Amer. Litho. ever intended to print this back. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bill Kasel
Fantastic card, every time it comes up I enjoy seeing it again. There's nothing wrong with the $45K price IMO. All it does it generate a buzz that will likely make it known to more of the masses driving up the price (even if it's only a 10th or so of the posted starting bid). Smart marketing at a minimum (if it works |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
I guess I don't know enough about this card. Why is it being called the "Rosetta stone" of T206 cards? What exactly did we learn about the printing process of T206's from this card? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T E
When I first posted a picture of this card on this board a couple of years ago, in one post I said off-handedly, "If it was worth $3,000, I'd probably sell it." I received a blizzard of offers at that point. My experience with auctions and similar situations tells me in such a case that the object is worth considerably more than the initial offers. What is the true value of the card? I don't know, but it is one-of-a-kind, and it is a geat looking card. If it doesn't sell I am very happy to keep it. This card means a lot to me sentimentally. But $45,000 or more, sentimental or not, will send it away. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
TE, I know what the Rosetta Stone is, what I'm wondering though is what secrets to the printing process of T206's did your card unlock? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T E
I was refering to comments made about the card on this board in the past, ie, I think Ted commented at one point (I think it was Ted) that the card proves that the backs and fronts were all printed at the same plant, also, to my eyes, card seems to demonstrate the process used to print, and possibly the color order. Rosetta Stone seemed like a fun way of expressing that. But I am open to suggestions on the text...feel free to email- hoofaway@aol.com |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd C
As someone already put it.....you can never get tired of looking at that card. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: johnny
i don't post as often as i should, but i check this board daily to see any t206 scraps/errors/ unique t206 oddballs...it's all i collect, if you watch ebay, i won the recent chance printers scrap (sorry for the lack of scan/picture)...anyway, this card is a beauty!!! |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T E
Johnny, it is my belief that this card was circulated inserted into unknown brand. It may have been used as scrap on reverse side at factory, but at some point, it was turned back over, and then cut and distributed in whatever pack it was inserted into. This card was one of about 180 I bought in a shoebox from a nostalgia type store back in the 1970s. The store had just purchased them from original owner's family. The collection was fairly typical for what a boy growing up in New York area would have collected back in 1911, weighted towards Hall of Famers (three Cobbs, at least five McGraw, several Matty, I eremember quite a few New York Giants in the group) all in Gd to Ex condition with a few lower grade, no reverse stock loss on any, and nothing out of the ordinary but for this one. The backs were as I recall mostly Sweet Caps and Piedmonts, a few Old Mill, a couple of El Principe, American Beauty, etc. Definitely no Polar Bear, I would have remembered that! It looked like a normal kid's collection of baseball cards, much like the Topps cards I had collected in the 1960s. I can't believe that this one came from anyplace else but a pack of smokes. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: johnny
thanks for listening....i think ur right, this one slipped thru.....but, i would suspect a few more to surface, i have seen none like this......i have been searching for these oddballs now 12 years or so, i have never seen one with so many backs, i have seen some with multi backs....all different types up to 3 overstrike multi backs...never one with a portrait/back multi combo as nice, really a true gem, you are truly right, i look at these like little works of art and think they are undervalued now big time, they are pretty rare and more collectors suck them up!!!45,000 is a little steep, but i think one day that might be a reasonable price...obviuosly you love this card and i know how you feel t.e....i become attached to my errors and wouldn't want to part with them at any price sometimes...they are one-of-a kinds and in my opinion are much rarer than realized... |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lyle
but had a question about the price . No disrespect intended , but how did you decide on $45,000 ? Is it purely random or is it based on a sale of another error card ? I understand you can ask whatever you want for the card but was just wondering . |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul S
Lyle, it's like getting 6 cards in one |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Damn, and I was going to put in a bid for 38K. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
I agree...this is an amazing card...and I'd love to have it in my collection. I can also understand the asking price as it seems you really don't want to sell it. On the open market I'd guess it'd sell for less than $20K...still a princely sum for what may have ended up in the trash many years ago. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lyle
it's over $7k per card ! |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
nm |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T E
Because it is beautiful. An image like this is created by either genius or a lightning bolt accident. Since Warhol and Lichtenstein weren't around in 1909. it's the lightning bolt that wins by default. I believe this card has aesthetic appeal beyond baseball. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
TE, for 45K that card better do more for me than just not let go. |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim
I can’t justify the asking price for this card but was wondering the following... |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: johnny
tim, |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Levy
As a collector of print rarities....I'll throw my hat into the ring. It's certainly not unusual for print errors with multiple back strikes to sell for a couple thousand bucks, and none have been nearly as amazing as this one. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jodi Birkholm
I suppose the novelty of this card would be appealing to some. Back when I still collected cards, there was a very short-lived hype with all of the multi-overprinted scrap illegally salvaged from the dumpsters at Upper Deck in 1989. From my recollection, those were long ago written off as worthless. To me, this card is no different (I am not saying it is without value). Just one guy's opinion. As somebody pointed out elsewhere on this site, the material I specialize in is also esoteric, so to each their own. I'll never understand the hype in this case. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhys
As the baseball card hobby moves closer and closer to the destiny of stamps and coins, things like this happen. Coins and stamps place a high value on misstrikes and errors and things just like this Cy Young. 10 years ago this would have been either worthless or odd and neat to a couple of guys worth a very small premium. Now $45,000? I remember ordering some T206 cards from a catalog in about 1995 and getting them in the mail and one of them having pieces of 4 Piedmont backs on it because it was so off center. At the time, I was pissed that this flaw was not disclosed, now its worth big bucks. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Rhys- it will be the same as the other two. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
What you just said is soooooo true. But recall, it 1st occurred back in 1981 when the coin and stamp dealers initially crossed-over |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
Good observation...damn those stamp and coin bastids! |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T E
No sale. Back to the drawing board. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Adam
Good for you for starting it with a .99 cent price. Even if the final bid does not meet your reserve, whatever the final bid is should give you (and everyone else, including myself) a good idea as to the approximate value. I would say in that 4k to 5k range, but let's see what the market says! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Final hours of auction~ You Tube of Mullaney/ Cy Young Ghost reverse T206 card... | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 4 | 07-09-2008 11:06 AM |
Some tobacco, Colgan's, '61 Topps PSA - ends tonight | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 10-19-2007 03:50 AM |
PSA 4 T3 Lajoie ends tonight on ebay... | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 07-16-2007 10:06 AM |
T206 Bresnahan portrait PSA 2 MK ends tonight | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 03-01-2007 05:33 AM |
Reverse (Backward) Ghost Image ... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 11-18-2005 08:24 PM |