![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Paradis
I sent in 38 PSA cards (T206, Exhibits, Yuengling's, Tharp's, R316, Fan Craze, T3, CJ) for crossover to SGC. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Thanks for posting these results...as bad as they are it gives us an idea of what is going on. I was speaking to the owner of quite a few PSA Registry sets last night, many of them the best there are, and he has had all of his cards crossed over to SGC. He also was disappointed at some of the findings but totally agreed with SGC. He had the #1 E90-1 set and said he was thinking about giving all of the flips back to PSA but then said....what's the point? He is done with PSA......Fortunately I barely ever sent anything to them. High grade PSA cards will eventually suffer due to their issues, imho..... If you are in the inner circle in the hobby you will know where card doctors send their wares.....PSA. All of that said I do think that most PSA cards are good....I personally don't trust them though.......regards |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Mt. Joy
I have been meaning to post these here, add my results. I decided to switch half my collection (keeping mostly 1950-1970 with PSA) to SGC after the whole half grade mess. That said I had been thinking hard about switching for a while because of inconsistent grading and that was the spark I need to change over. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tony Andrea
Recently crossed over my entire E90-1 set into Sgc holders. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
"He had the #1 E90-1 set and said he was thinking about giving all of the flips back to PSA but then said....what's the point? He is done with PSA....." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave F
This is definately my worry with crossing stuff from PSA as well....I posted this yesterday as the card I most want to cross, does anyone feel this will get a 50? Would probably be better if I busted it out...but honestly at this price range I can't bring myself to do that...I hope not a SGC 40 anyway... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
That should cross to a 50 from the looks of it. Just put on your form that you want the same or higher grade....which I think was explained in another current thread. regards |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave F
Closer view- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
Dave - no reason to bust it out - many of us have gotten bumps on cross-overs without cracking out - so SGC seems to not be biased by the number on the case. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Mt. Joy
I think you will get an SGC 50 for sure, that card looks very solid with only a little corner wear. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Sean BH
Looks like a 50 to me, can you see any wrinkles? I would think that would be the only thing that wouldn't cross it to 50...heck it might be a PSA 4.5? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Paradis
1. I strongly believe that SGC grades the card what it should be (regardless of the PSA/GAI grade). So I believe cracking cards out of PSA/GAI case is a waste of time (and a risk you don't need to take). |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CrossOver Question SGC -> PSA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-08-2008 10:55 PM |
crack/resubmit or crossover results | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 06-18-2007 07:45 PM |
49 Bowman SGC to PSA crossover | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-23-2006 11:36 PM |
Crossover PSA to SGC ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 04-22-2006 09:37 PM |
crossover PSA to SGC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 11-17-2005 07:42 AM |