![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave
Not to hijack Ted's thread but I have a T206 that has a different situation. I have a Bresnahan portrait that has a glossy look to his hair and collar only. Has anyone ever had a card that has only certain features with a glossy look to them? Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
The black ink is glossier, so black areas will often be glossier than lighter areas. What you describe is common on a t206. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
double post |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
I don't know how many members on the board have seen Burdick collection at the Met in New York, but a lot of the T206 and T207’s look unusually glossy. It makes me wonder, since the T206’s were printed in so many differnet printing facilities, maybe some of the printers ran a higher gloss ink or smoother surface paper, which may give the apperance of glossy? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
Ordinarily, one would not be surprised to hear of variations in a massive set produced over three years. There are variations in ink and stock in Topps sets. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Loss of Gloss on Worch Cigar PCs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-22-2009 11:54 PM |
Another T206 question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 08-27-2008 12:30 AM |
T206 Question?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-05-2007 08:01 AM |
T206 question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 02-20-2006 12:00 PM |
T206 Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-25-2002 04:40 PM |