![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kelly
The past few E92 Dockman Honus Wagners that I have seen for sale on Ebay were the throwing style. More often than not in the seller's description it states..."Throwing variation, the more difficult of the two Wagners from the set." This is there no matter the condition, so they are not referring to the idea that one is harder to find in better condition than the other. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
There is a lot of misinformation still out there, and while I too thought that Wagner throwing poses as a rule were tougher than batting poses, the numbers seem to prove otherwise. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard
Barry - I believe you are thinking of E102. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce MacPherson
I agree that it seems like there are more throwing variations in the Dockman set as well as the other e92 sets. As stated above, the e102 throwing variation is much more difficelt to find than the batting. I am not an e90-1 collector, but I believe the throwing variation is considered to be tougher in that set as well as in the e105 set. So, maybe e92s are the exception to the rule. Just a guess. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
i think there are more throwing variation in the e93 and e98 set also. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ephus
There is a batting crofts cocoa, but PSA has accepted 0 submissions on this card, and SGC doesn't differentiate between the two and has only 4 submissions for cocoa Wagners. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Aaron
Personally, I have seen more throwing versions then batting of the e92 wagner. Received my e92 Dockman back from PSA recently, it has a mechanical error. I will have to send it back to get it corrected. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Another sloppy PSA label. Where is their quality control? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve f
Perhaps he was throwing his bat? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Aaron
No thanks Steve, although your flip is correct.....I choose to keep my e92. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BcD
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve f
Okay hotshot, we're talkin E92s |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
E92 backs: whats the order of difficulty | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-31-2009 02:24 PM |
Is this legit? e92 Wagner........ | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-18-2008 07:37 PM |
E92 Crofts Cocoa Wagner, E105 Mello Wagner | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 03-14-2008 11:45 AM |
E92 Wagner Hand Cut | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-28-2005 08:25 AM |
E92 Dockman Wagner for sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 09-25-2005 08:47 PM |